What Does The Boogeyman Look Like?

26.07.2023 0 Comments

What Does The Boogeyman Look Like
What Does the Boogeyman Look Like? – Because there are so many different variations on the boogeyman mythos, there are many different descriptions of what the monster supposedly looks like. The majority have standard-issue “monster” physical traits, such as claws and sharp teeth or other animal-like features.

They usually have a somewhat humanoid form (usually male-appearing) combined with these supernatural or animal features to make them more haunting. Some of them might conceal their faces or wear a cloak or hood, making them look even more mysterious and frightening. In different myths, the boogeyman may be depending on its purpose.

The more mischievous or scary-but-harmless versions are likely to be described in less grotesque terms than the ones that have more violent mythos.

What does The Boogeyman do to his victims?

Physical description and personality – While the description of the bogeyman differs on a cultural level, there are often some shared similarities to the creatures. Many of the bogeymen are depicted as having claws, talons, or sharp teeth. Along with that, the majority of bogeymen are of the spirit variety, while the minority are demons, witches, and other legendary creatures,

Some are even described to have certain animal features such as horns, hooves, and bug like appearances. When looking at the personality traits of the bogeymen, they are most easily divided into three categories; the kind that punishes misbehaved children, the kind that are more prone to violence, and the kind that protect the innocent.

They all relate in the same way, being that they all exist to teach young children lessons. The large majority of bogeymen are there to just frighten children with punishments, and not actually inflict much damage. The more vicious bogeyman is said to steal the children at night, and even eat them, or another example of violence.

What is the description of Boogeyman?

An imaginary monster used to frighten children. synonyms: bogeyman, booger, bugaboo, bugbear. type of: monster. an imaginary creature usually having various human and animal parts.

Who is the real Boogeyman?

Fish’s dreadful urges could not be satisfied. By Audrey Webster | Published Jan 10, 2019 We’ve all heard of—or seen—the boogeyman. He’s the monster who hid under your bed and in your closet when you were a kid. He gave you nightmares and made you afraid of the dark.

  • But what happens when a real-life boogeyman exists? In the early 1900s, too large a number of unfortunate children found out after meeting Albert Fish.
  • He’s been known by several different monikers: “The Werewolf of Wysteria,” “The Gray Man”, even the “Brooklyn Vampire”.
  • No matter the alias, Albert Fish was the notorious Boogeyman Killer whose attacks took place over the span of ten years, causing terror in New York and throughout the United States.

Born Hamilton Howard Fish, he changed his name to Albert to commemorate a dead sibling. Fish’s father was 43 years older than his mother, and died by the time Fish was five. Many of the facts regarding his early years are largely unknown; however, what little details we do have point toward a deeply troubling childhood.

  1. Want more creepy stories? Sign up for The Lineup’s newsletter, and get our strangest tales delivered to your inbox.
  2. Mental illness and religious mania ran in the Fish family.
  3. After his father died from a heart attack, Albert’s mother placed him in an orphanage.
  4. The reasons behind this are unknown, but we can safely assume they are linked to his mother’s wavering income and her inability to care for all four of her children.

The orphanage was where Fish was first exposed to violence. He was repeatedly whipped and beaten. During the course of his beatings, Fish began finding sexual pleasure in them, which brought on vicious teasing from the other children in the orphanage. In 1882, his mother landed a government job and was able to bring Fish back under her roof, but by then it was too late; the damage had already been done.

Related: 13 Terrifying Real-Life Cannibals That Will Make You Sick to Your Stomach Fish began a consensual relationship with another boy at age 12. This boy introduced him to extreme sexual practices, such as drinking urine and eating feces. Fish began spending his weekends in public baths, watching the young boys undress.

He was still just in his early teens.

Photo Credit: Murderpedia

Upon his arrival in New York City in 1890, Albert Fish became a prostitute to satisfy his sexual urges. However, when his day job no longer satiated him, Fish began raping young boys. This practice continued even after he agreed to an arranged marriage proposed by his mother.

Fish married a woman six years his junior, and the couple had six children. Fish was eventually arrested for embezzlement and spent a handful of years in prison. During that time, he had sexual relations with countless men. Upon his release, Fish began an affair with a lover, despite his marriage. One afternoon, Fish and the man visited a waxworks museum where the pair witnessed the bisection of a penis.

From that moment on, Albert Fish developed a fascination with castration. Related: The Little-Known Serial Killer Who Murdered 23 Men At one point in their relationship, Fish managed to convince his male partner to be tied up as part of a sexual game.

It’s unclear just how much of their sadomasochist relationship was with the consent of this man, Thomas Kedden, who is believed to have been mentally impaired. After tying Kedden up, Fish kept him isolated in an abandoned farmhouse for weeks, torturing him mercilessly during that time. Eventually, the torture escalated to the point where Fish reenacted his waxworks museum experience and sliced off half of Kedden’t penis.

Intending to murder Kedden, Fish began to worry that the heat of summer would cause the smell of a hidden, dismembered corpse to be noticed. Instead of killing him, Fish cleaned Kedden’s wound with peroxide and covered it with Vaseline. The final fate of Kedden is unknown.

Fish, being escorted to his trial. Photo Credit: Murderpedia

In January of 1917, Albert Fish’s wife left him for the handyman who had been staying with them. Shortly after his wife’s departure, Fish began hearing voices. He once rolled himself up in a carpet, claiming that he was following the orders of John the Apostle.

  1. His children, who remained with him, do not report being abused, although claims that Fish had his children paddle him have surfaced over the years.
  2. The maiming of Kedden took place in 1910.
  3. It is believed that over the next few years, Fish mostly curtailed his nefarious activities, but began torturing, raping and killing again after his wife left him.

In 1919, Fish stabbed a mentally handicapped boy. From this time on, his victims were nearly always either mentally disabled or African American: Fish believed no one would notice when these children went missing. Related: 25 Books About the World’s Most Famous Serial Killers Over the next decade, Albert Fish’s crimes became increasingly violent and frequent.

Although it’s unknown just how many children he killed, thanks in part to his tendency to choose victims that would go unnoticed, the murder of three children by Fish has been confirmed. Young Francis McDonnell was discovered missing by his parents in 1924. Out for the day playing catch with friends, McDonnell never returned home.

McDonnell’s friends and mother both reported seeing a “grey man” watching the boys play. After a search, McDonnell’s body was discovered, with extensive signs of torture and sexual assault. One other exception to Fish’s rule of choosing victims at the edge of society was Billy Gaffney.

Grace Budd, Fish’s most famous victim. Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Beaton was reported missing. Soon, reported sightings began flooding in, including one claiming to have seen an older man with the boy on a trolley. The boy was crying for his mother while the man was attempting to quiet him. The police matched the description of the boy to Gaffney.

Gaffney’s body was never found—Fish later confessed to murdering him, dismembering the body, cooking and eating it. Related: Alfred Packer: The Maneater of Colorado Just over a year after this crime, Fish committed perhaps his most infamous murder. He came across a classified ad in the Sunday paper by a young immigrant boy, Edward Budd, seeking employment.

Fish responded, posing as a farmer wanting to hire a farm hand. When discussing this crime with authorities after his arrest, he noted his intention had been to kidnap and murder Budd. But then he saw Budd’s younger sister Grace, and his plans changed.

He returned for a second meeting, offered Budd the job, and asked if the parents would allow Grace to accompany Fish to his niece’s birthday party that evening at his sister’s home. He said the girls were about the same age and would likely make great friends. The parents granted permission and Grace left with Fish that day, but never returned.

Want more creepy stories? Sign up for The Lineup’s newsletter, and get our strangest tales delivered to your inbox. After Grace’s disappearance, not only was the wrong man tried for the crime, serving nearly a year in jail before the actual culprit was caught, but the family also received a letter from Fish.

  1. Riddled with misspellings, the note relayed what had happened to the girl and how Fish came to his lust for human meat.
  2. Although in the letter, Fish claimed the girl “died a virgin,” he confessed during an interrogation with police that he had raped her.
  3. However, Fish was known to compulsively lie, so it is impossible to know the facts of the case.

The trial for the murders of the three children lasted 10 days. Albert Fish pleaded insanity, claiming to have heard the voice of God telling him to kill the children. The jury heard evidence from his children, doctors, and his victims’ relatives. The most famous and disturbing evidence from the trial was an X-ray of Fish’s genitals.

  • Over 20 needles had been embedded there by Fish himself.
  • There was much debate on whether his sexual fetishes meant he was insane, but ultimately the jury found him sane and guilty, and the judge ordered the death sentence.
  • Related: 19 Creepy Serial Killer Quotes Upon his initial arrest, Fish boasted that he had “had a child in every State.” This would skyrocket the number of victims, exceeding 50; however, it remains undetermined if this meant molestation, cannibalization, or both.

As Albert Fish was also known to lie and exaggerate, it is unclear if he can be taken at his word here. As it is, the deaths of the three children (Budd, Gaffney, and McDonnell), were enough to send FIsh to the electric chair at Sing Sing. Thanks to his hunger for human flesh and horrifying fetishes, this boogeyman will live in infamy.

What is The Boogeyman afraid of?

Quotes. ‘The Boogeyman isn’t just some ordinary Boggart that can be expelled through a simple Riddikulus. That thing is a Tulpa, a creature born from the dreams of mankind, or in his case, nightmare. He isn’t just some embodiment of fear of the dark, he IS the fear of the dark, of the strange, of the unknown.

Does The Boogeyman have a weakness?

Is the Boogeyman Really Dead? – Image via 20th Century Studios The Boogeyman ‘s story unfolds as expected. First, the creature targets Sawyer, knowing the grow-ups won’t believe the girl’s fantastic stories about a monster in the closet. However, as the beast grows hungrier, the Boogeyman also begins to torment Sadie.

Then, after the malignant presence can no longer be denied, Sadie does what she can to find out more about the Boogeyman, asking for Rita’s help. The girl then discovers light is the Boogeyman’s only weakness, which is why the creature is constantly breaking lamps. While Sadie quickly accepts there’s something wrong with Sawyer and does whatever she can to help her younger sister, Dr.

Harper takes a while longer to be convinced that the Boogeyman is real. Even after the creature attacks Sawyer, throwing her around the living room, Dr. Harper still prefers to pin everything on a child’s delusions. He also refuses to acknowledge his pain for losing his wife, even after Sadie surprises him crying alone in the hospital.

The turning point of The Boogeyman happens when the creature attacks Dr. Harper, dragging him to the basement. After that, Sadie and Sawyer must join forces to rescue their dad. The final duel against the creature has the whole family using whatever tool they can to produce light and fire to subdue the beast.

Finally, after many struggles, Sawyer throws some flammable solvent over the Boogeyman, and Sadie lights the monster on fire with the lighter that belonged to their mother. The beast turns into ashes in front of their eyes. Sadly, the flames also engulf the Harpers’ home. Image via 20th Century Studios The last scene of The Boogeyman occurs at the therapist’s office, with Dr. Harper finally agreeing to join his daughters in grief counseling. The family expresses their fears and doubts in the session, growing closer due to their shared trauma.

So, it’s not a coincidence the Boogeyman was defeated just as Dr. Harper realized he had to open up to fully support his daughters. Before the credits roll, the Boogeyman makes one final appearance. When the whole family exits the therapist’s office, Sadie hears the woman calling her back inside. When Sadie returns to check what the therapist wants with her, she finds an empty room.

There’s only a closet partially open, from where the voice called Sadie. Since the Boogeyman can mimic other people’s voices, Sadie understands the monster is still alive and reaching out to her. However, when the actual therapist shows up, Sadie faces her fears and closes the closet door.

Since the Boogeyman represents parental neglect, it’s fair that the creature is still around. As the older sister, Sadie was more aware of Dr. Harper’s distance, which might explain why she’s apparently the only one who can still hear the Boogeyman. Even so, by shutting the closet door, Sadie sends a message to the monster.

She believes her family is stronger now, and Dr. Harper will keep working to be a good father. As such, they are ready to leave the Boogeyman behind. The Boogeyman is now in theaters.

Is The Boogeyman Scary?

Hope you like your jump scares extra jumpy! – The Boogeyman premieres in theaters on June 2, 2023 While Jason Voorhees, Ghostface, and Freddy Krueger have become icons of horror cinema, is there a more famous harbinger of dread than the vague concept of The Boogeyman? Children tucked under blankets shiver at the thought of this fable-like creature behind closet doors or slithering under bed frames; we all feared – or still fear – that Boogie bastard.

Rob Savage’s job as director of The Boogeyman is to maximize the simplest, most universal of after-dark horror stories from childhood, which he does well enough with a scare-packed albeit formulaic adaptation of Stephen King’s short tale about shadow-dwelling demons. At its best The Boogeyman brings the goshdarn spookiness and serves as a reminder that, when done right, PG-13 horror can still be a terrifying experience that’ll rattle even horror addicts.

Writers Scott Beck and Bryan Woods pull from their horror-forward A Quiet Place scripts that focus on traumatized families fighting ferocious creatures, joining co-writer Mark Heyman to tell the tale of the fractured Harper clan’s fight against an unsightly evil.

Yellowjackets standout Sophie Thatcher stars as eldest daughter Sadie, who anchors The Boogeyman alongside teeny-tiny little sister Sawyer (played excellently by 10-year-old Vivien Lyra Blair). Thatcher and Blair embrace the unnatural terrors that spring from flung-open closet doors as disturbing figures scamper between patches of blackness, never underselling the powerless feeling of nostalgic childhood paranoias.

Chris Messina grows a salt-and-pepper beard to play their psychologist father Will, but isn’t much help as his imagination can’t fathom a true-to-reality Boogeyman; Thatcher and Blair themselves gas up their Boogeyman foe’s scare tactics scene after bloodcurdling scene.

  • David Dastmalchian makes the most of a few scenes as Lester Billings, a gloomily tragic character from King’s original mini-thriller.
  • Same for Marin Ireland as our resident shotgun-cocked Boogeyman-believer who Sadie turns to for advice.
  • Thatcher and Blair are clear stars of The Boogeyman, but it’s an all-hands-on-deck effort that helps make the barebones campfire story blueprint seem beefier in appearance.

This unsettling urban legend movie hardly rewrites horror history – it’s a yummy slice of homestyle horror comforts. Infrequent innovations like Sawyer’s illuminated moon orb as a rolling light source are small victories in an otherwise by-the-books excuse to petrify audiences.

Expect this one to be a sleepover superhit once it’s released on streaming. In-your-face jump scares are Mr. Boogey’s addictive bread and butter. Savage doesn’t shy away from in-your-face jump scares, which are Mr. Boogey’s addictive bread and butter. The Boogeyman does PG-13 horror proud, exploiting familiar bedtime-bumps-in-the-night storytelling for a dependable fright night that’ll no doubt get butts flying out of seats.

There’s nothing provocatively subversive about a Boogeymonster continually lunging from darkness after beady eyes tease its presence, yet there’s no lack of high-impact scare executions. Savage validates humanity’s collective anxieties surrounding the dark by scaring the literal piss out of Sawyer and Sadie, rarely wasting an opportunity to shred our nerves as nightfall brings another slew of Boogeyman-related nightmares.

  1. Effective as they may be, maybe The Boogeyman is a bit too reliant on jump scares, because its story doesn’t go that deep.
  2. Savage parallels David F.
  3. Sandberg’s textbook-terrifying Lights Out – an earlier exploitation of timeless Boogeyman-adjacent mythology – only Sandberg’s story plants deeper roots.

This is a movie that operates cleanest as a haunted attraction where siblings are spooked senseless by their live-in tormentor, but less so when addressing trauma responses due to the death of the girls’ mother. “Trauma” is used in a buzzword capacity, complete with the callously cookie-cutter treatment of Sadie by catty high school stereotypes and Will’s closed-off reactions at home.

  • The Boogeyman loses minimal steam between righteous scare sequences involving Sawyer’s PlayStation gameplay as a light source or a psychologist’s red cube that strobes slower by the second, always on top when we’re clenching tight at the sight of shadows.
  • Creature design rises in its importance.
  • It helps that The Boogeyman entity itself is a crossbreed between a nimble insect with crooked crackles-when-it-crawls appendages and an emaciated human with sunken eyeholes.

Creature design rises in its importance in the Harpers’ eerily enormous-feeling house, where no one can hear you scamper away from a Boogey attack. There are glimpses where the Boogeyman doesn’t look the smoothest in its animation, but Savage uses darkness to minimize these imperfect monster closeups.

What is eating Boogeyman?

The Boogeyman is one of the most chilling characters in WWE history. The monster-like character was first introduced to fans in 2005 and fans have since wondered if the worms he eats are real. For those wondering, The Boogeyman does indeed eat real worms for his WWE stints. Wright began his wrestling journey in 2004 by joining the fourth season of Tough Enough, where he lied about his age. After surviving the first day of eliminations, he admitted to being 40 years of age instead of 30, Marty was later removed from the show as his original age was five years above the cut-off point.

Still, the company remained interested and offered him a tryout at Ohio Valley Wrestling. The Boogeyman wrestled in WWE from 2005 to 2009 before he was released, He returned to the Stamford-based promotion for sporadic appearances throughout the years then signed a WWE Legends contract in 2015. He first returned during the 2012’s Slammy Awards then entered the Royal Rumble in 2015 where he faced off against Bray Wyatt.

Marty Wright also appeared during the RAW Reunion in 2019.

Is The Boogeyman Immortal?

History – The Boogeyman’s history is shrouded in mystery. Rita Billings, one of its targets, speculates that the Boogeyman is an immortal entity that has lived since the beginning of time and is the origin of the Boogeyman legend. The Boogeyman attaches itself to hurt and vulnerable families, usually ones that have experienced a loss of a family member.

After one of the Billings’s children died of SIDS, the Boogeyman invaded their home and began terrorizing the remaining children. The children’s parents, Lester and Rita, didn’t believe their children’s warnings until the Boogeyman murdered them and left them both to take the blame. A grieving Lester went to a meeting with psychiatrist Will Harper.

When Will, believing Lester was potentially dangerous, left to call the police, the Boogeyman attacks him and hangs him inside a closet. Lester’s corpse is discovered by Will’s daughter Sadie, and his death is subsequently believed to be a suicide. The Boogeyman begins haunting the Harper family, as Will’s wife had died in a car accident.

  1. The Boogeyman primarily haunts the youngest child, Sawyer, frequently tormenting and assaulting her.
  2. It also stalks Sadie, even following her when she meets with Rita.
  3. When Sadie’s friends lock her inside the closet where Lester died, the Boogeyman attacks her until her friends manage to open the door.

The Boogeyman subsequently causes a blackout in the house and attacks Sawyer and injured her, leading to her being hospitalized. Sadie meets with Rita, who promises to kill the Boogeyman. However, she does so by tying Sadie up and using her as bait. When the Boogeyman comes to kill Sadie, Rita fires at it with a shotgun and manages to injure the creature.

However, the Boogeyman plays dead and attacks Rita when she gets too close, killing her. The Boogeyman then pursues Sadie until she steps into the light, repelling it. When Will and Sawyer return home from the hospital, the Boogeyman attacks them and drags Will into the basement, breaking his leg. Sadie arrives and, alongside Sawyer, heads into the basement to rescue Will.

The Boogeyman attacks the family, but Sadie is able to repel the Boogeyman with a makeshift flamethrower made from a lighter and hairspray. The hairspray runs out, but Sawyer douses the Boogeyman with lighter fluid and Sadie sets it ablaze with the lighter, causing the monster to burn to death and avenging the countless families it killed, including the Billings.

Does The Boogeyman have eyes?

Why The Boogeyman Looks Like A Spider Creature – Although mostly blanketed in darkness except for its two glowing eyes, The Boogeyman resembles a spider creature when it’s finally revealed by a light source. Not only do spiders evoke a frightening form with their long legs and multiple limbs, they also move quickly and unpredictably after their prey.

  • Spiders are fond of the dark, and prefer to dwell in cool moist places, and as an eldritch creature from ancient times that fear light, The Boogeyman developed into something most humans associate with a primordial fear.
  • Spiders also have extensive webs to ensnare victims, which they often wrap up and save for a later meal while they slowly dissolve from the inside out.

This explains why once firmly entrenched in a household, The Boogeyman’s “web” begins to take over in a vast array of dark tendrils, and it keeps its food supply well stocked by choosing to prolong the grief and fear of its victims. The arms that grow out of its mouth and reach for its victims are not filled with sharp talons or claws but reflect what they most need, a comforting embrace, which they use to suck the life from them.

Is Chasing the Boogeyman a real thing?

Chasing the Boogeyman The New York Times bestselling coauthor of Gwendy’s Button Box brings his signature prose to this story of small-town evil that combines the storytelling of Stephen King with the true-crime suspense of Michelle McNamara. In the summer of 1988, the mutilated bodies of several missing girls begin to turn up in a small Maryland town.

  • The grisly evidence leads police to the terrifying assumption that a serial killer is on the loose in the quiet suburb.
  • But soon a rumor begins to spread that the evil stalking local teens is not entirely human.
  • Law enforcement, as well as members of the FBI are certain that the killer is a living, breathing madman—and he’s playing games with them.

For a once peaceful community trapped in the depths of paranoia and suspicion, it feels like a nightmare that will never end. Recent college graduate Richard Chizmar returns to his hometown just as a curfew is enacted and a neighborhood watch is formed.

  1. In the midst of preparing for his wedding and embarking on a writing career, he soon finds himself thrust into the real-life horror story.
  2. Inspired by the terrifying events, Richard writes a personal account of the serial killer’s reign of terror, unaware that these events will continue to haunt him for years to come.

A clever, terrifying, and heartrending work of metafiction, Chasing the Boogeyman is the ultimate marriage between horror fiction and true crime. Chizmar’s writing is on full display in this truly unique novel that will haunt you long after you turn the final page.


Richard Chizmar is a New York Times, USA Today, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Amazon, and Publishers Weekly bestselling author.He is the co-author (with Stephen King) of the bestselling novella, Gwendy’s Button Box and the founder/publisher of Cemetery Dance magazine and the Cemetery Dance Publications book imprint.

  • He has edited more than 35 anthologies and his short fiction has appeared in dozens of publications, including multiple editions of Ellery Queen’s Mystery Magazine and The Year’s 25 Finest Crime and Mystery Stories.
  • He has won two World Fantasy awards, four International Horror Guild awards, and the HWA’s Board of Trustee’s award.Chizmar (in collaboration with Johnathon Schaech) has also written screenplays and teleplays for United Artists, Sony Screen Gems, Lions Gate, Showtime, NBC, and many other companies.

He has adapted the works of many bestselling authors including Stephen King, Peter Straub, and Bentley Little.Chizmar is also the creator/writer of the online website, Stephen King Revisited. His fourth short story collection, The Long Way Home, was published in 2019.

With Brian Freeman, Chizmar is co-editor of the acclaimed Dark Screams horror anthology series published by Random House imprint, Hydra.His latest book, The Girl on the Porch, was released in hardcover by Subterranean Press, and Widow’s Point, a chilling novella about a haunted lighthouse written with his son, Billy Chizmar, was recently adapted into a feature film.

Chizmar’s work has been translated into more than fifteen languages throughout the world, and he has appeared at numerous conferences as a writing instructor, guest speaker, panelist, and guest of honor. Displaying 1 – 30 of 3,065 reviews What is the purpose of fiction? Could it be to pull the wool over our eyes so completely that we forget we are reading something made up and totally false? Chasing the Boogeyman is a fictional account of the brutal killings that took place in the author’s hometown of Edgewood during the late 1980s.

Teenage girls would first go missing and then turn up mutilated and posed. Before long, the town is in a frenzy of fear and suspicion. While the police work feverishly to catch the serial killer, Richard Chizmar is drawn to the case and his firsthand account eventually becomes the book we’re reading. Yes, you read that correctly.

The author wrote himself into a fictional story. I’ve only encountered that ploy in one other book series before, and I’m a big fan. It creates a feeling of authenticity that, along with the true crime narrative style used here, makes it hard to dispute or look away from.

  • There are even crime scene photos included with every chapter, which further adds to the real and chilling atmosphere.Needless to say, I found the whole thing to be absolutely riveting.
  • I got through it in two days—but only because I started late the first day and had to take a break to sleep—and I was so into the story, I ended up with insomnia.One thing to note: while I inhaled practically the whole book, I did almost abandon it in the beginning because I found the opening to be really dry.

This was especially the case with “Chapter One: The Town,” which provides a detailed history of the town going back to colonial days and also includes random tidbits from the author’s childhood, such as his house, favorite hangout spots, and even how many cracks are in certain sidewalks.

I know what the author was trying to do here, but it was all irrelevant and almost did me in.However, I’m so glad I didn’t give up on this book. It turned out to be well worth the effort of the first thirty-five pages. If you’re giving this a try, I’m not above suggesting you skim liberally or even skip straight to Chapter Two if you’re feeling bogged down with the earlier pages; you won’t miss anything.

This is one of the those books where the story is just as important as the format, and both worked together to create that perfect narrative. The blurring of the lines between what is real and what is fiction happens frequently and enthusiastically here.

  1. If the goal of fiction is to immerse the reader into a tale so bold and true as to feel authentic, then surely this must be the perfect tale.
  2. Yay! One of my favorite, smart, mind blowing reads is out today!🥳🥂📚Wowza! This is.
  3. I cannot find a proper word how this precious gem made me feel! It’s certainly extraordinary, mind blowing metafiction is written like a true crime fiction! Extremely disturbing, spin tingling, nerve bending, twisty, outrageously surprising and truly explosive! This book haunted my soul! Its unique writing style, realistic chapters reminds you of documentary scripts, unconventional conclusion are truly haunting your soul and giving you nightmares! Especially the author’s final notes made me perplexed at the end.

I just got numbed! Mouth stayed opened! Eyes are popped out! If someone took my photo at that time and showed to little children: I guess they would suffer from nightmares for years and called me real boogeywoman who can not boogie dance. I highly truly extremely recommend you to read this freaking fantastic gem if you are addicted to true crime nonfictions, podcasts, perfectly written thriller books! You get all of your needs in one read! Let me give you quick summary of plot line;Our disturbing story takes place in small Maryland town: Edgewood where the mutilated bodies of several young teenage girls are found in 1988.

Press called the murderer as Van Gogh killer because of his tendencies to cut the pieces of ears of his victims but mostly he’s called Boogeyman! Rich Chizmar, 22 years old college graduated young man, a fresh journalist candidate returns back to his hometown with his meager belongings to stay with his childhood house on the corner of Hanson and Tupelo roads, before his wedding with his high school sweetheart.

Before arrival of Rich, three days ago, a 15 years old girl: Natasha Gallagher has been snatched from her bedroom in the middle of the night. He already knew the girl and her family who have been attending the same church with his family. The girl is found strangulated! Everybody asks the same question: what kind of monster does that? Rich became the witness.

  • He was there when the hell broke loose.
  • He was haunted because somewhat that monster’s story became his own.
  • The murderer left hopscotch grids in front of the houses where the victims were living.
  • He left missing dog sign, pennies, pumpkins as he took lives of Kacey Robinson, Madeline Wilcox, Cassidy Burch.

He never left any DNA residue. He was smart. He was like ghost as if he’d been never there! Maryland State Police Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation promised to continue pursuing active leads and testing additional person of interests. But they were chasing a ghost! How could they catch him? It’s a surprising, original, haunting story you never dare to put it down! I’m ending my review with John Milton quote Rich Chizmar chose to add which quote fits with the entire soul of this intense, dark story: “Innocence, once lost, can never be regained.

Darkness, once gaze upon, can never be lost.” So many thanks to NetGalley and Gallery Books for sharing this fantastic digital reviewer copy with me in exchange my honest thoughts. Oh so clever!! How could I NOT give this 5 stars? The concept is brilliant!!And, so was the execution! Described as part memoir, part fiction that reads like TRUE CRIME, it is so believable that I kept thinking I misread something! I even googled the “crime” halfway through to see if it at least closely resembled an actual event!!Author Richard Chizmar grew up in Edgewood, Maryland, a town where each generation of children feared the “Rubberband Man” and where the “Phantom Fondler ” found his prey.Told from his personal perspective, he was 22/years old and living back at home, when all four Murders occurred:Natasha GallagherKacey RobinsonMadeline Wilcox andCassidy BurchHe is privy to the details that the police held back from the Public because of the friendships he formed with Detective Lyle Harper and reporter, Carly Allbright.

But 30 years later, the case remained UNSOLVED.SO, WHAT ABOUT THE PHOTOGRAPHS??At some indistinct point, in this story, the TRUTH becomes FICTION.but where? You won’t know until you read the AUTHOR’S NOTE, at the very end. I read one of the author’s 100 published short stories last year, “The Girl on the Porch” and even commented that I would have loved to see that story fleshed out into a full length mystery so, I was excited to see this full length book being offered and it did NOT disappoint!! His magazine “Cemetery Dance” is now in its 32nd year of publication, and he also co-wrote Gwendy’s Button Box, with his friend, Stephen King.

You might be interested:  What Does Throwing Up 4 Fingers Mean In Pictures?

Trigger: Again, our killer feels the need to tell us that he started his killing with birds and cats, in the interview granted in the AFTERWORD, so I flipped to the next page as soon as I read “stray dog”. “I was there. I was witness. And, somehow, the monster’s story became my own.” Chasing the Boogeyman is an intelligent novel about a serial killer terrifying a small town in Maryland in the 1980s.

What makes this novel standout is the format; this is not your average suspense/horror novel as it is written in the style of a true-crime book. Told from the first-person point of view of fictional Richard Chizmar, the reader gets to intimately get to know Edgewood, the serene neighborhood setting, and its residents.

  1. Chizmar’s personal relationship with the town and some of the victims adds another layer, as his first-person account blurs the line between reality and fiction.
  2. The inclusion of photographs of Edgewood and the victims added to this dichotomy.It takes a while for the events to kick off.
  3. Chizmar spends time at the beginning of the novel providing a detailed history of Edgewood.

This helps the reader develop an intimacy with the small town. When the murders began, I felt a jarring shift as the picture of serenity quickly shifts to terror. This is a slow-paced yet suspenseful read, especially as the tension between the narrator and the killer builds.

  • Even though I knew I was reading fiction, I couldn’t shake the feeling that the events were not real, which made this an intriguing reading experience.
  • Chasing the Boogeyman is as much about unraveling the mystery behind the killer as it is about the fictional Chizmar finding himself.
  • Props to Chizmar, as this is a tightly plotted, unique read that took me on an intense reading journey.

Let’s say you’re a Stephen King Constant Reader, and you’ve gone through his entire catalogue. What to do, what to do??? May I offer Richard Chizmar’s Chasing the Boogeyman for your consideration? Other than picking up a book by Uncle Stevie’s own spawn Owen King or Joe Hill, you can’t get much more King-adjacent than this.

Chizmar not only has coauthored a novella with him (Gwendy’s Button Box), but he’s also mentioned ad nauseam throughout the story. Plus, the overall creepy tone and 1980’s small town New England setting emit major SK vibes.That comparison aside, Chasing the Boogeyman is a high concept serial killer thriller with an intriguing approach to the genre.

Although fictional, it’s written in the style of a true crime memoir in which the author weaves his own real life childhood in with the murder mystery he made up. How very meta! Black and white photographs of the crime scenes and key players are even interspersed throughout the pages.

  • The end result is a very unique reading experience.
  • Many have classified the novel as horror, but this particular Constant Reader needs more than a serial killer nicknamed the Boogeyman to feel any twitches or tingles.
  • I may be a wee bit jaded after reading so many murder stories, and horror (much like humor) can be subjective.

Either way, this boogeyman is worth the chase. My thanks to the author and Gallery Books for providing me with a gifted copy to review via NetGalley. Blog: HAPPY PUBLICATION DAY!

  • An intriguing and unique work of fiction that reads like a true crime novel.
  • Chasing The Boogeyman is an engaging and cleverly told suspenseful mystery, and I look forward to reading more of Chizmar’s work.
  • Review also posted at:

The year is 1988, and Richard Chizmar (the author) has just graduated college and moved back home to his parents house in Edgewood, MD in advance of his upcoming nuptials. After a few teenaged girls are found murdered, it becomes evident that there is a serial killer haunting the streets of Edgewood.Neighborhood Watch groups are formed, curfews are made mandatory, and everyone is on high alert.

Richard is right there in the center of it all as an aspiring writer and someone who is very familiar with the streets, passageways, and history of the town.As the FBI track down leads, Richard and his journalist friend, Carly, work to find their own discoveries, but Richard needs to be careful. He feels like he’s being watched.

He’s getting mysterious calls at his parents home. Chasing the “boogeyman” may not be a safe endeavor. This is written entirely as a true crime novel, with pictures to boot. Chizmar’s writing is engrossing and compelling as he intersperses parts of his own past and beginnings to his writing career with the overall fictional story of a serial killer in his hometown.

  1. It’s clever and unique, fully atmospheric, and intriguing.
  2. There are some moments of unease that caused a slight shiver, but I didn’t find it genuinely terrifying like some of the reviews I’ve seen (I’ve also found that I usually don’t agree with Stephen King’s quoted blurbs).
  3. Maybe I would’ve felt differently if I read it on a dark and rainy night.

Even so, if the purpose of this book is to entertain, it succeeds. I imagine readers will have different thoughts about how everything wraps up. I may have wanted a bigger revelation, but all of my outstanding questions were answered. There is a brief mention of animal harm that’s unsettling, but not overtly graphic or drawn out.

  • Thank you to Gallery Books and NetGalley for an ARC in exchange for an honest review.
  • Available: 8/17/21.
  • Not Disappointed.
  • When I started reading this book I was not feeling it.
  • The first section was ponderous and boring.I was thinking about quitting the reading and find a different book to read.
  • But for some reason I decided to pick the book up and read it.I am so glad I did.

The next section was incredible. Each chapter sped by quickly. The writing was fabulous. The book is full of suspense and mystery. I’m told that it’s not totally true crime, but also fiction. I can’t figure out which is which, but it doesn’t matter.The book is awesome. Outstanding!! Who knew Fictional True Crime could even BE a genre, or that it could be SO good?! I actually stay away from true crime because I can’t handle knowing about the ways that real people have suffered. Plus the cases never really get solved so there’s no closure.

Police and lawyers can speculate on what happened but only the perp and the victim actually know the truth and one of them is dead and the other isn’t talking. But since 𝘾𝙝𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝘽𝙤𝙤𝙜𝙚𝙮𝙢𝙖𝙣 is fictional those things weren’t issues and I enjoyed this brilliant book right down to the last page.

The lines between Chizmar the author and Chizmar the character are blurry and that added to the story’s sense of realism. He wrote with such honesty that I feel like his love for his childhood town and his friends and family is real and that he decided to just drop a serial killer into the mix to see how it would play out 🙂❓💀 I’m a little late to this party and I am sure you have all heard the buzz about this book.

  • A fictional serial killer story meant to read like true crime, pictures and all, and partly a memoir.
  • Unfortunately for me this read more as a memoir rather than a serial killer story or a true crime re-telling which was very disappointing to this reader.
  • Don’t misunderstand, the parts of this book that I enjoyed I actually loved.

However, the parts that I didn’t bored me to tears. And sadly the bad far outweighs the good in my opinion. All of the chapters that focused on the four murdered teenage girls – LOVE, LOVE, LOVE. All the rest – BORING! While I think Chizmar is an incredibly talented writer his info dumps come fast and furious in this book.

  1. Page after page of unnecessary minutia.
  2. I assure you I know ALL the ins and outs of Edgewood, MD after reading this.
  3. He leaves out nothing; you get the entire history of the town.
  4. I know all of the ways he spent his summers running through his neighborhood as a teen, and I also know how much he really loves his family and fiancé (now wife).

While I think he had a genius idea here I don’t feel like it was executed well at all. I can’t tell you how many pages I skimmed but it was many! This droned on and on and on with very little excitement or suspense. Again, this felt like a memoir, and even though he was totally obsessed with the murders they still seemed to take a back seat to his reminiscing about his youth.

  • I should also mention that I don’t believe for a minute that the detective in charge of this case would have spilled so much confidential information to a curious 22 year old writer that just happens to be interested.
  • A lot of “If I tell you this you can’t say anything, okay?” type of bullshit. THAT. WOULD.

NEVER. HAPPEN. The revelation of the killer was surprising as I never once suspected this person. I did like that he got to interview the killer in the end but even that left me wanting. There were questions he asked that the killer wouldn’t answer but claimed he would at a later time.

This led me to believe there would be a second interview but nope, the book ends, and we never do get those answers. Richard Chizmar seems like a heck of a nice guy. The kind of guy you could watch a football game with and have a beer. He’s also an incredibly talented author but this one just didn’t tick my boxes as I was hoping.

This has a 4.27 average rating on Goodreads and the majority of my friends have all loved this so please know that I am an outlier in my opinion.3 stars! 4.5 stars— If you are looking for a different type of book experience than a typical thriller novel, then “Chasing the Boogeyman” is for you.

  1. My five minutes of research after finishing this book tells me this type of writing style is called metafiction which interweaves in this case true experiences of the author with fictional events.
  2. It is not until the author’s notes at the end when you find out exactly what is real, what is inspired by real events and what is completely fictional.

“Boogeyman” is structured as a true crime book written in 1st person perspective of the author, Richard Chizmar. The author tells the story of a serial killer that ravages the town of Edgewood, Maryland in 1988. Chizmar was living there at the time and had spent his whole life as a resident of the city, giving him a unique perspective of the people and locations affected by the murders.

  1. As the reader experiences each death form the author’s personal perspective as it happens, it seems to make the book more personal and tragic than a normal thriller.
  2. The author includes photos of the victims and the crime scenes after each chapter and is really detailed in describing the events.
  3. The book is so different and well written I had to round up to 5 when giving my rating.

The small criticisms I had of the book are that 1) there is no resolution to the issue of what certain evidence left at the crime scene and on memorials mean, and 2) the long windedness of Chizmar on some of his personal reflections (especially at the beginning of the book) that have nothing to do with the main storyline of the book.

  1. A solid 4 ⭐️!I loved the uniqueness of this book and the idea of bringing together fiction and non-fiction into the same book.
  2. I’ve never seen anything quite like that and it was innovative to say the least! The photos throughout were also a great touch and added more personality to the already individualistic book.

There were parts that got painfully slow, but if you power through, it’s worth the wait. Although I was hesitant to give Chasing the Boogeyman a go given its peculiar nature, this was an awesome pick for this Halloween season and I’m not disappointed I gave it a try! I’m looking forward to checking out Chizmar’s other works.

It’s like the guy sliced open a hole in the night,” one state trooper complained off the record, “and disappeared back into it.” this book is a whole new thing; a gripping metafictional mélange of true crime and crime fiction, memoir and horror, and chizmar pulls off this ambitious undertaking seamlessly.the phrase one always hears when it comes to popular narrative nonfiction is that “it reads like a novel.” this one is just the opposite—it’s a novel constructed to read like narrative nonfiction, and it is breathtakingly convincing.

it’s shaped a bit like, blending the elements of the (let’s call it) true crime story with memoir, as the author/character becomes more personally invested in the series of murders plaguing his hometown and more involved in their investigation. but it also borrows from the structural conceit of found footage horror movies, incorporating photographs and interviews with key figures involved in the case, suffusing the story with authenticity.

It’s framed as a new edition of a book previously published by chizmar in 1990, about the murders of four teenage girls from june-october 1988 in his hometown of edgewater, maryland. at the time, he was a 22-year-old recently-graduated journalism major living back home with his parents waiting for his fiancée to finish her degree before embarking upon their espousèd life together.

chizmar used this little limbo period to make a go at becoming a writer of horror and mystery stories, and starting up his own horror ‘zine, cemetery dance.the murders began soon after his return, and when he wasn’t writing fictional tales of horror, he became increasingly consumed with the real-life horror-mystery unfolding in his previously-idyllic small town, teaming up with his fiancée’s childhood pal courtney; a working journalist unofficially investigating the case.the 1990 book ended with the crime still unsolved, and this updated version provides closure: an arrest, a confession, and an interview with the killer.* and that is all well and good, but for me, the closing of a cold case, the serial killer mystery thread, the procedural/amateur sleuthery, that was all background for the more compelling part of the story, which was the tainted nostalgia of a man forced to re-examine his cherished childhood memories as an adult and come to terms with the whole das unheimliche of girls being found savagely murdered in the places that had previously been home to his fondest memories—the formative experiences and locations that made him who he was.

because this book is also a love letter to edgewater, and chizmar knows every inch of this neighborhood; its geographical shortcuts and residents and history, and he brings it all to life down to the smallest details with the insights of someone intimately familiar with the physical terrain and social mores.

I believe that most small towns wear two faces: a public one comprised of verifiable facts involving historical timelines, demographics, matters of economy and geography; and a hidden, considerably more private face formed by a fragile spiderweb of stories, memories, rumors, and secrets passed down from generation to generation, whispered by those who know the town best.

chizmar is privy to both, and here, the past encroaches on the present in a truly visceral way: Every time I took a break from the computer screen and glanced outside, I imagined the ghosts of my childhood friends sprinting shirtless across the lawn, whooping with laughter and disappearing into the wavering shadows, beneath the towering weeping willow whose spindly branches had snagged so many of our taped-up Wiffle balls and provided hours of cooling shade in which to play marbles and eat pizza subs and trade baseball cards.

his hometown slowly darkens into a haunted space, supplanting and overwriting these cherished memories with new ones; of strangled girls with bite-marked bodies, search parties, funerals, and memorials to the victims, bearing witness to his neighbors succumbing to suspicion and fearful gossip, to women cutting off their long hair so as not to resemble the killer’s evident type.

  1. Drawn by his horror writer sensibilities to investigate the actual horror unfolding, chizmar and carly likewise seem to be drawing the killer to themselves, experiencing creepy phone calls, acts of vandalism, and the feeling of being watched, hunted, in their most private spaces.
  2. The creepy parts’ll get under your readerskin, but equally praiseworthy are chizmar’s recollections of the carefree americana childhood spent knocking around this small town.

it’s sweetly-encapsulated boylife at its finest; all wholesome rambling and gentle mischief, the details of which are presented with the vivid perfection found in the works of his literary influences ray bradbury and stephen king, whom he invokes both by name and in the style of his prose: Ever since I was a child, it was my favorite time of year—a season of absolute magic.

The air smelled of ripe apples and dying leaves and wood smoke. The wind made you ache in some place deeper than your bones. The sky overhead was layered with rich shades of orange and yellow and purple and red and a host of swirling colors too beautiful to be named. The harvest moon—swollen and magnificent, and so close on the horizon you could almost reach out and touch it—paid its annual visit and left you yearning for more.

Clouds drifted by, peeking over their shoulders, reluctant to make way for winter’s footfalls. Naked tree branches reached out as you walked past, skeletal fingers hungering for your touch, and packs of fallen leaves crunched beneath your wandering feet, their boundless brethren skittering past you in the chill autumn breeze like miniature ghosts haunting the landscape.

  • Dusks and twilights lingered.
  • Midnights stayed forever.
  • Fat jack-o’-lanterns flashed jagged grins from porch railings and windows, flickering orange eyes tracking your every move.
  • It’s a successful genre mashup and brilliant tonal chimera, by turns lovely and unsettling, intense and meditative.
  • And james renner, master of both of these balancing-act skills, is the perfect fellow to virgil a reader into its pages.

* whose identity probably would have surprised me if, when i was only about three chapters in, i hadn’t stuffed my goddamned mail into the book in the foyer on my way up to my apartment, inadvertently bookmarking the page where the killer’s photo appeared and, upon retrieving my stupid bills, my fast eyes tractor-beamed to the caption and ruined it for me.**************************************when i first heard about this genre-blendy true crime/crime fiction mash-up, my first thought was “i wonder if james renner knows about this book?” since that’s his whole wheelhouse.

i forgot to email him to put it on his radar, which oversight worked out just fine, because once i finally got my hands on a copy, i opened it up to discover that james renner wrote the dang introduction! begging the question, why didn’t he tell ME about this book, hmmmm? In the summer of 1988 several girls go missing, and their dead bodies found posed in a small Maryland town.

Richard Chizmar aspiring writer returns to his hometown right before the second murder. Drawn into figuring out who is terrorizing his town, Richard writes his personal account of the serial killer’s reign of terror. Also, the killer seems to be taking an interest in him.

  • Mysterious hangup calls and someone seems to be following him.
  • Will they find out who the Boogeyman is before he kills again? I usually loathe books that are fiction but try to be nonfiction.
  • However, I loved it in this form.
  • Basically, it is a fiction true-crime book.
  • The pictures at the end of each chapter really enhanced the story.

It made me feel for the characters. I highly recommend this one! Billed as suspense/horror, I feel as if I missed something. Despite the blurb comparing this story to Stephen King and Michelle McNamara, I failed to see a resemblance. Richard Chizmar, the author, writes this as part memoir/part fictional ‘true crime’.

  1. He tells us this part is fiction up front, so this is not a spoiler.
  2. Richard recounts the details of murders that happened in 1988 when he was fresh out of college.
  3. His hometown of Edgewood, MD was in a state of panic after four young girls were murdered, the work of a serial murderer nicknamed The Boogeyman.

Richard teams up with Carly, a fellow journalist, to try and solve the case, and is given details of the case from a detective (if I didn’t already know it was fiction, this would have been my first clue). Richard spends much time reminiscing about his small-town upbringing, including the minutiae of life in Edgewood.

Those who are nostalgic about the 1980s may find these parts engaging. However, they didn’t contribute to the plot development at all, and the story dragged in places. Richard is not involved in catching the killer in any way. Nothing happens to him that is scary or tense, and the tone is light. The final revelation of the murderer was surprising, but only because there were no clues that would have led to that conclusion.

Worse yet, during an interview with the “murderer” certain things were never explained. More than one plot thread was dropped or fizzled. I wasn’t convinced by the staged (fake) photographs either. The girls looked older than teens with nothing about their appearance to indicate the 1980s. Finishing out 2021 with a fiction book that reads like a true crime book. Takes me back to my younger years in many ways: I was totally obsessed with true crime when in middle/high school and this book was set during those years. I could feel the time period and the setting.Chizmar takes a very unique approach to this book.

He sets the book in his hometown during the late 1980s, where a number of young girls are abducted and murdered. This is a fast paced novel that follows the few months where these incidents took place. It’s written with Chizmar as one of the main characters in the book, a recent journalism graduate living at home for a few months before getting married and moving to another city.

He and another journalist are invested in helping to figure out who committed these atrocious acts. Sprinkled throughout, as with most true crime books, are photographs of the different players and locations. It gives such a real feel to the book, and although I’ve heard that the audiobook contains PDF files of these photos, I think that in this case the print book is the way to go in order to get the real “true crime” experience.

As with a real true crime book, there are some unanswered questions in the end, and although it gives authenticity to the story, it was frustrating to me. It’s fiction, so give me all of the answers! Overall, this is a creepy book that offers a sense of foreboding throughout and I read it fairly quickly wanting to know who had committed these murders and why.4.5⭐ A unique true-crime mystery.

It is fiction though, right? 😯I love the format in this book. YES, it’s fiction as said in the notes on the first page. Then comes the second page that threw me off balance and was confused again. Wait. there are many photos of the victims, the police, crime scenes, and detectives working the case. 5+ stars! Brilliant! Shocking! Clever! Terrifying! Engrossing! Phenomenal!! Best book I’ve read in a long time! All time favourites shelf!This is a unique and captivating genre mash up. Part true crime, part memoir, part psychological horror. This was insanely brilliant and refreshing! This was a large step outside of my usual reading genres and I LOVED EVERY SINGLE PAGE of it! I was quite literally addicted to this book from start to finish. READ THIS BOOK! ’nuff said.But if you want more, here it goes.

  1. Summertime, 1988
  2. Believe the hype and I’ll say it one last time – READ THIS BOOK!
  3. Read more of my reviews at

The mutilated bodies of several missing girls how up in a small Maryland town. The Police believe that a serial killer is targeting those young women in their suburb utopia. But there are rumors that the killer may not be human. *gasp* If the killer is not human, that what is it? The police and FBI will tell you to not believe the rumor that the killer is in fact a human who is playing games with them.Richard Chizmar is a recent graduate and has returned to his hometown armed with his curiosity, his journalist friend, Carly, and writing utensils.

  1. He is planning his wedding, but he is also planning on doing some detective work on his own.
  2. He feels as if he is being watched, strange calls are coming in, and well, he may have put himself in a little danger.This reads as a true crime book with photos which make this book feel even more real.
  3. But it is a work of fiction.

I had to remind myself of this several times while reading. Parts are taken from the Author’s real life which also give this book a very authentic feel. Don’t stop reading when you reach the end, the Author’s note is a must-read section of this book as well.I saw the glowing reviews and had high hopes for this book, and it did not disappoint.

I found myself to be fully invested in this book and didn’t want to put it down when real life called. It’s intriguing, so well thought out and executed. Thank you to Gallery Books and NetGalley who provided me with a copy of this book in exchange for an honest review. All the thoughts and opinions are my own.

Hot smoking dang!!! My fingers were on fire, turning the pages as fast as I could!! This one is not just another horror story. It is a one-of-a-kind exciting READING EXPERIENCE!! Richard Chizmar is a genre blending genius and one brilliant author. He combines horror fiction, a small-town mystery, with true crime that uniquely defies any tired, overused tropes around murdered girls and small towns.

  • He creates one of the most clever, haunting, and terrifying stories I have ever read.
  • For this reason, only I think this is one not to be missed.
  • What I lovedRichard Chizmar is the main character in the story, and the setting is his hometown in Edgewood, Maryland, in the 1980s.
  • It also reads like a memoir as he shares his history and relationship with the town and its people.

Suspense is created with a unique hook by telling us what to expect right off the bat. Chizmar drops little clues for us but are not that obvious. The ending is not a shocker but isn’t predictable either. The photos, I won’t say any more about that.What I didn’t love as muchRichard Chizmar takes a long chapter to invoke that sense of place with some history of Edgewood, and I probably would have lost patience if Lindsay hadn’t warned and told me it picks up.

This creates an exciting dimension and dynamics between the reader and the town. He paints a clear picture to visualize the events as they play out. It is important to the story to pay attention as it is rewarding to do so. Reason to read this one If you like an out-of-the-box compelling, tension fueled, suspenseful, and terrifying story that blends horror and true crime.

If you are not a fan of true crime, you might not find the “telling” of the story as exciting as we did. I expected to love this book, but honestly I’m not sure how I feel about it. I am struggling to verbalize what I didn’t like about this book. I just find it so strange that it’s a fictional story that reads like true crime and the author is the main character.

  1. I guess I just expected more? I was really engaged with the first half, and I was especially enjoying the supernatural elements of the book, but then I feel like it just never went anywhere?I see a lot of other reviewers saying this is a 5 star idea and a 2 star plot and I’d have to agree.
  2. The concept of this book sounds really cool, but the execution wasn’t my favorite.

If I didn’t have the audiobook to help me get through it I might have stopped reading it. Most of the book was so boring and the author just dragged on about these stories from his childhood (which may or may not be true?? Like who knows lol 😅) I guess I just don’t really see the hype with this one. If you’re a fan of true crime, READ THIS What a great way to write a book! Richard Chizmar is starting his career as a writer. He moves back to his childhood home with his parents in the small town of Edgewood after finishing college. He is saving money for his wedding to his high school sweetheart.Just before he moves back, a young teenager is found strangled near her home.

  • The police get quickly involved and start trying to piece together the crime.
  • Then another young teenager goes missing.
  • The town is shocked.
  • Something like this has never happened before.
  • Who is doing this? What kind of monster? The Boogeyman?Young Rich can’t leave it alone.
  • He and his friend, Carly Allbright start investigating the case.

He knows the culprit has to be near. But it is safe? Someone is calling his home and hanging up. Then, he feels like someone is following him. Lastly, he believes the murderer is seeking him out. But why? Excellent! It had me entertained from beginning to end.

The story felt so real! The author makes you believe everything he is saying happened way back when he was a young man fresh out of college. A serial killer is on the loose and Ric is in the middle of it.Cliffhanger: No5/5 FangsA complimentary copy was provided by Gallery Books via Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.

| | | 4.5 starsMany of us love living in a small town. It seems to offer us peace, freedom from crime, deliverance from unending traffic snarls, and a somewhat bucolic life. It’s a panacea for what many seek.a quiet life.When tragedy in the form of murder comes to town, it reverberates through the residents, and takes away their sought-after sense of peace and safety.This is what happened in a sleepy village in Maryland as one of its residents Richard Chizmar, a recent college graduate returns home and takes up his desire to be a journalist.

  • He takes up the gauntlet and of course becomes involved with the murders and its abhorrent mutilations while the town gossips and lives in fear.
  • Young women are abducted seemingly out of midair and found dead with the killer taking a trophy each time and staging the bodies.
  • It’s a harrowing tale, one that has people wondering with various supposed sightings if this boogeyman is truly something not of this earth.We follow Richard as he unearths clues with the help of a police lieutenant as well as a reporter.

Richard tries to puzzle out who among his neighbors and maybe even friends and acquaintance could be the boogeyman.I very much enjoyed this book as it read like a true crime story, (although it is faux). I was totally invested in Richard’s search for the killer and although the ending was somewhat rushed, Mr Chizman kept the energy flowing and compulsive reading followed.

Included in the book was pictures of the victims and places where the crimes occurred, adding a layer of truthfulness to the story. It was a clever story, reminding me of the author Anthony Horowitz inserting himself into his stories. If you enjoy true crime and are looking for a book that while it is not horror, but is one that this author compels you to believe is real.

Nice job Richard Chizmar! “Chasing the Boogeyman” by Richard Chizmar is truly a unique reading experience for readers that love horror with an authentic true crime twist. I originally wanted to read this book because of the fact that Chizmar has co-written a book with the legendary Stephen King and even King himself said this was “genuinely chilling” and that’s all I needed to know.Once I saw that ringing endorsement by my all-time favorite author, I immediately purchased this book and could not put it down once I started.

  1. Chizmar has a wonderful way of writing and creating memorable scenes, places, characters, events, and well, murder.
  2. To add that extra touch of realism, the pictures you’ll see used across many chapters in this book showing characters, places, and much more are all truly bone-chilling.Overall, this book gets a perfect 5/5 from me because it was absolutely fantastic and something refreshingly new in the horror genre.
You might be interested:  What Does Mending Do In Minecraft?

The ending is beyond satisfying, creepy, and something that I will remember for many years to come as it was great. I’m also proud to say that upon finishing this book, it was my 10/10 book for my 2021 Reading Challenge on Goodreads! I started late this year in rekindling my love of reading again back in July 2021 as I set a small yet reachable goal.

Let me tell you, this was an amazing read and an awesome way to finish my reading challenge for the year much earlier than expected. I will undoubtedly recommend this book to anyone that loves horror or true crime as it was one incredible reading experience that just felt so real. I am now a huge fan of Chizmar and plan to read his previous work as well as anything he writes in the future.

This book left such a good impression on me, he’s got a new loyal reader for many years to come. Four teenage girls are killed during the summer of 1988 in Edgewood, Maryland. These events shake this small town to its core and put everyone on edge. The serial killer is given the name the Boogeyman.

  1. Richard Chizmar has just returned home after graduating from college while he awaits his upcoming wedding when the killings begin.
  2. Richard and his friend, Carly Albright, a journalist at the local newspaper, try tracking down their own leads to figure out the identity of the Boogeyman which puts them in the Boogeyman’s line of sight.

Chasing the Boogeyman messed with my head a little, but definitely in a good way, I knew this was a work of metafiction, but it really reads more like true crime. There are also pictures of the victims, locations throughout the town, and the police investigation added throughout the book which give it an even more realistic feel.

I actually got confused a few times and thought I was actually reading about a real event to the point that I actually tried finding some of the characters and murders online. The author cleverly adds himself as the protagonist and tells the story from his perspective. This along with the fact that he also includes actually memories from his childhood since he grew up in Edgewood blurs the line between fact and fiction even more which I thought was a brilliant way to write the story.

My only issue was that I felt the hopscotch grid, things left by the boogeyman at the scene and the numerology were an important part of the story, yet their significance was never explained. The synopsis states that it is “a marriage between horror fiction and true crime”, but it didn’t feel like horror fiction to me at all.

  • It was definitely creepy in parts, but not scary or overly graphic.
  • This is a book where I feel the Author’s Note is a must since it helps clear up what is real in the story vs what is not.
  • Overall, I really enjoyed this book and and the storytelling.4 stars.
  • Trigger warning: There is mention of the killer’s harming of animals at the end of the book.

Many thanks to Netgalley and Gallery Books for an advanced eARC in exchange for my honest opinion. Publication date: August 17, 2021. I thoroughly enjoyed Chasing the Boogeyman and I’ve already searched for more Richard Chizmar books. I listened to the audiobook, and Chizmar’s smooth writing style along with Chris Andrew Ciulla’s perfectly matched narration lolled me into a state where didn’t want want to stop listening.

The true crime aspect was brilliant, and I enjoyed the Author’s note at the end where we found what parts and people were actually real. At 9pm, after saying goodnight to her parents, the girl walked up the stairs, closed her bedroom door and went to bed. No sound was heard in the night. Her parents slept only steps away.

But when her mother called her down for breakfast the following morning, there was no answer from behind the still closed door. A broken screen lay on the ground outside her window; a tiny smear of blood on the windowsill; no footprints; no sign of Catherine.

She would be the first that summer of ’88. The summer the Boogeyman changed a small town forever, and the Richard Chizmar’s life too. He would go on to write about it, and then many years later, pick it up again. Here’s the beef. I didn’t want to put this book down. I felt the vibes of I’ll Be Gone in the Dark on a focused scale, moving inside the dome of a one small town.

A place where people know their neighbor’s first names, where a single tragedy can effect the whole community. The pace, although slow to start, becomes practically constant, pushed along by the narration of a young author caught up in the middle of his own home town’s mystery.

The writing begins a bit clunky, adjective phrases galore, but there’s a reason for this. He’s just an author-to-be when first putting the pen to paper. The later transition is apparent, becoming part of an ending that just may shock you. Occasionally the phrase, Gets thrown around upon a new book’s release and generally I avoid those books like the plague due to the fact that,

But when my real life friend told me this was a must-read for October, I took a handful of preemptive Extra Strength Tylenol and decided to give it a go. I see this was a real mixed bag for my friends and I am interested to see why it was a miss for so many.

  • I’m assuming most of the naysayers received galleys and therefore didn’t really know what they were getting into upon beginning, but maybe that’s not accurate and they simply did not like this tale (and that is okay for any of you trolls out there thinking about trollin’).
  • For me, though???? This was how I wish I’ll Be Gone in the Dark had been presented.

While McNamara’s posthumous true crime novel attempted to detail an actual true crime, the lack of evidence and so much of her own story thrown in made that one a massive flop for me. But if it would have been presented as part memoir/part mindhunter????? I think it would have been a win.

Or maybe not, but this one sure was! The story here details the goings on of a serial killer in Edgewood, Maryland back in 1988. Author/publisher Richard Chizmar was fresh out of college with the ink still wet on his journalism degree with aspirations of becoming an author by trade as well as starting his own magazine.

Living with his parents in an attempt to save some money before his impending nuptials – Chizmar had a near front-row seat for the brutal murders of a handful of local girls over the course of the Summer and Fall. Presented as a memoir, this is Chizmar’s recollection of the local Boogeyman, Displaying 1 – 30 of 3,065 reviews Get help and learn more about the design. : Chasing the Boogeyman

What is a bogyphobia?

Bogyphobia – Fear of the boogeyman.

Is Baba Yaga the boogie man?

The Russian Witch Named Baba Yaga – The John Wick franchise is actually wrong about Baba Yaga being the “Russian boogeyman.” This has been a source of confusion for people who are familiar with the name, as well as fans who dedicate time to understanding a beloved character’s backstory.

Baba Yaga’s roots and origins in Russian folklore create an even deeper meaning to John Wick, which makes it surprising that the franchise was not as attentive to this detail to strengthen the story. Baba Yaga is not the “Russian boogeyman” at all, she is a different being altogether. That said, considering, the Baba Yaga is not that different from the modern-day assassin.

In Russian folklore, she is a witch who lives in a disheveled home that stands on chicken legs. Similar to the Brothers Grimm tale of the witch in Hansel And Gretel (1812), Baba Yaga lures children into her home to devour them. She surrounds her home with the human remains of her victims. If John Wick’s nickname was truly referential to the boogeyman, he would be called a Babay. The term translates to ” a boogeyman, ” not a particular individual, but one of many. Moreover, Baba Yaga is a nickname that might be better suited for a member of — someone with the personality and influence that actually matches that of the Russian witch.

In fact, save for their penchant for murder, John Wick does not share any other similarity with Baba Yaga – he is not malevolent nor does he seek to harm the innocent. On the contrary, he wants revenge on those who have done wrong. On the other hand, perhaps there is more to his story than viewers know – more of which will be further revealed in John Wick 4,

Until then, the use of Baba Yaga in the John Wick franchise is confusing and a bit unnerving if his character is based primarily on his nickname. Despite these problems with Baba Yaga, John Wick’s misnomer of a nickname, the fact is that its part of what makes the successful.

  • Indeed, John Wick’s nickname is a four-syllable story on its own, directly connected to the affairs of the Continental, the Russian mob, and the existence of the High Table.
  • These elements come together to provide the distinct vibe and concrete lore that differentiate John Wick from any other action movie franchise in recent history.

As John Wick franchise creator and screenwriter Derek Kolstad explained (via ), “what’s been great in developing John Wick, too, is we love John Wick, you know, I mean, he was the Baba Yaga. He was the devil. And there may be a bit of that still inside of him. Though John Wick might be the most famous character associated with Baba Yaga, she has long lingered in the zeitgeist. For instance, Baba Yaga is the primary inspiration for, also known as Voleth Meir. Not only did Voleth Meir’s hut have basilisk legs – similar to Baba Yaga’s chicken-legged house — the incantation to get into Voleth Meir’s hut is also the same as the one for finding Baba Yaga’s.

Another version of Baba Yaga also exists in The Witcher video games. Meanwhile, in the 2019 reboot, the main antagonist is an extremely horrifying version of Baba Yaga that is much closer to the Russian myth — a twisted spirit that commands ancient magics and manipulates others for her own malevolent ends.

Baba Yaga’s influence can even be traced back to the seminal, particularly through Master Roshi’s sister Fortuneteller Baba Saga, who is loosely based on the mythic witch. While these interpretations are much more faithful to the real Baba Yaga, the fact is that, today, John Wick is practically synonymous with the name.

  • John Wick 4 needs to follow through and reveal more about what the titular assassin has done that warranted such a fearful nickname.
  • Even though John’s thirst for revenge isn’t exactly a sign of good character, it’s scarcely enough to justify dubbing him the Baba Yaga of the Slavic criminal underworld.

Promisingly, it would seem that the franchise is headed towards a much darker story based on the, Depending on what the John Wick 4 plot reveals about John’s past, maybe he could be exactly like Baba Yaga after all. Next: : John Wick: What Baba Yaga Really Means

What is the phobia of monsters called?

Teraphobia (fear of monsters) is extremely common in pre-school-age children.

Can you get out of a boogie bomb?

How to cancel Fortnite Boogie Bombs without taking damage Published: 2020-09-03T08:01:01 ❘ Updated: 2020-09-03T08:01:01 Epic added Boogie Bombs back to the game in Season 4 ⁠— the first time since Chapter 2 launched. Players are already getting fed up with the grenade since its unvaulting, but there’s apparently a way to break free from the dance without taking damage. Riot Games Boogie Bombs were added back into Fortnite in Season 4. Typically, the only way to cancel a Boogie Bomb is to take damage, or wait for the five second timer to run out. This leaves your fate in your enemies hands ⁠— if they are good enough, they’ll burst you down instantly with no chance to fight back.

  • However, there’s a way that you can get out of the way of your enemies and cancel the effect without taking damage.
  • Article continues after ad You can apparently use crash pads to break free from the Boogie Bomb dance without taking damage.
  • This trick was uncovered by 100 Thieves pro ‘MrSavage’, who surprised his stream with the neat tactic to get away from an opponent set to kill him.

Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest updates on Esports, Gaming and more. It’s unclear as to whether it’s a bug or not, but players are able to throw down crash pads while dancing under the effects of a Boogie Bomb. This can create enough distance between yourself and your enemy to avoid certain death.

When was the Boogeyman created?

Creation of the bogeyman – The word bogeyman, used to describe a monster in English, comes from the Middle English bugge or bogge, which means “a frightening spectre.” Bogeyman itself is known from the 15th century, though bogeyman stories are almost certainly much older.

Because of the nature of the tales and the often indistinct or changing nature of the monster, it is impossible to trace the character to a single origin in any culture, much less globally. It is generally thought that the bogeyman was invented to serve as a caution or deterrent to children. By warning children that a bogeyman will capture them if they stray into the dark woods, for instance, parents might better ensure that children are cautious about where they go and when.

In this way, the bogeyman may serve as a shorthand for the various dangers to lone children in the woods. Instead of explaining that they may fall into a ravine, be attacked by an animal, touch something poisonous, and so on, a parent may more easily say “if you go into the woods at night, the bogeyman will get you.” The bogeyman also represents a supernatural presence that can do things a parent cannot do and go places a parent cannot go.

  • Children may know what punishments their parents are capable of assigning, but a bogeyman’s capabilities and motivations are unknowable—thus, all the more terrifying.
  • Sometimes children develop a concept of the bogeyman on their own.
  • When children begin to try to make sense of the world around them, they often experience fear, uncertainty, and anxiety.

This sense of dread, especially when alone or in the dark, can lead children to imagine unseen terrors lurking in the shadows, under the bed, or in the closet. However, because the bogeyman is a distinct entity, there is often a possibility of overcoming or defeating the monster.

Is it the Boogeyman or the Boogeyman?

The Bogeyman (Feminine: Bogeywoman), also spelled boogeyman, bogyman, bogieman, boogie monster, boogie man, Bogeyperson, Boogieperson, Boogeyperson, Bogieperson, or boogie woogie is a creature in English folklore that is often told to scare misbehaving children.

How did the boogeyman become a thing?

iStock As a kid, few things seem scarier than the threat of the boogeyman. The spooky myth surrounding this terrifying creature has been around for so long that many of us don’t even know anything about the boogeyman. Is it a person? A paranormal monster ? What does the boogeyman do to you? It’s unclear, but for kids, the mystery surrounding the boogeyman is one of the things that makes him even more horrifying.

If you’ve ever wondered about the boogeyman, you have to start by knowing where he came from. It’s true that the boogeyman has been around for a very long time and is a type of folklore that can be found all around the world. Destination America says that one early origin can be tracked back to the word “bugbear.” This was “used to describe a goblin/scarecrow/bear mashup that hunted and ate small children.” The site also says that the boogeyman was originally used as a tool to get kids to behave properly,

Since most folk stories and fairy tales were originally created to teach children morals, this makes sense. Think about it: many have threatened the presence of the boogeyman if kids did something that would jeopardize their safety, like walking in the dark alone or going into an unfamiliar space alone.

Who is Boogeyman ghost?

England – AKA: Bogeyman, Bogieman, Boogie Man, Bogy, Bugbear Other known whereabouts: English-speaking countries The Boogeyman is a shadowy, amorphous ghost who hides in dark places in order to frighten unsuspecting victims. He’s more of a nuisance than a danger, and his power is easily neutralized by bright light.

What are The Boogeyman rules in last life?

Changes – There are some significant changes to this season that weren’t in play last season. These are:

The change to the lives system

Instead of only having 3 lives, each player got a random number of lives (between 2 and 6) on their first episode. In their last life, they have to cut all ties with everyone, and become permanently hostile. Also, there is a new /givelife command, where players can trade lives with each other.

The new banned items

Bookshelves. Enchantment Tables, except for the one at spawn (although Scar and Joel are in possession of the spawn Enchantment Table). Level 5+ Enchantments. Helmets of any kind. Although not necessarily banned, there are no villagers located on the map, making it a more treacherous and tedious task for players to get materials.

The Boogeyman

This is a player who is chosen at the beginning of each session. The server does not reveal who the boogeyman is except for the boogeyman themself. They become hostile and have to kill 1 person to be cured. If not cured by the end of the session, they get put down to 1 life.

The Sleeping Rule

If the players want to skip the night, they have to all be sleeping. Hence, sleeping would be an unlikely thing to happen, so players would have to fight day and night.

Why is The Boogeyman bad?

5 /10 Entirely forgettable The Boogeyman is a horror movie inspired by a Stephen King short story. The film revolves around Sadie Harper (played by Sophie Thatcher) and her younger sister Sawyer, who are struggling to cope with the loss of their mother.

Their father, a therapist, attempts to assist them in dealing with their grief, but their household becomes a site of mysterious occurrences. Directed by Rob Savage, known for his work on “Host” and “Dashcam,” the movie is completely unoriginal. The plot feels predictable and derivative, borrowing elements from other horror films.

The story progresses slowly, resulting in very few genuine scares. The themes of grief and trauma are present in the film but are not explored in depth. The movie’s overall tone aims for darkness and sombreness but fails to establish a pervasive sense of dread or suspense.

  • Sophie Thatcher’s performance as Sadie is commendable, delivering a solid portrayal of her character.
  • However, the remaining cast members are forgettable, and their characters remain underdeveloped throughout the film.
  • The director, Rob Savage, demonstrates some competence with a few visually striking scenes.

Nevertheless, the movie lacks a distinct visual style to set it apart. The score is forgettable, failing to leave a lasting impression, while the cinematography is serviceable but unremarkable. The production design and special effects in The Boogeyman are decent but cannot salvage the movie’s overall poor quality.

  • The editing suffers from sloppiness, resulting in disjointed and poorly paced scenes.
  • The dialogue lacks inspiration, with characters frequently delivering exposition and relying on clichéd lines.
  • The Boogeyman is an easily forgettable horror movie that struggles to deliver genuine scares or explore emotional depth.

Its derivative and predictable nature, underdeveloped characters and slow-paced plot contribute to its lacklustre impact. The film fails to establish a distinct visual style despite a few visually striking moments. Unless you are a diehard horror genre fan, it is best to avoid this one.21 out of 24 found this helpful.

  • Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
  • Permalink 8 /10 Needed a better title.
  • This is really good.
  • Truly, this movie was screwed over with its title.
  • I know it’s an adaptation, but “The Boogeyman” makes it sounds like a bottom-of-the-bargain-bin DVD movie.
  • But while far from original, this is a thoroughly well-crafted, at times thoughtful horror film.

By far, this is one of the most frightening PG-13 movies I’ve seen. Director Rob Savage has a lot of talent, and he wields the camera with style and with care. Excellent sound design and mixing, as well as a smart subdued musical score, build anticipation for each scare and don’t let up the tension once something has been revealed.

The monster is horrifying in its design, but Savage wisely doesn’t show it to us very often, and never really shows it to us in detail. Dark, oppressive atmosphere pervades the screen and it leaves a lot of distressing things to the imagination. While this isn’t the first film to hold grief or trauma as a metaphor for its monster, it’s done quite well here.

The family dynamics in this script are restrained and well-realised, with satisfying thematic payoff at the end. I have only one major issue with the film, and that’s that the characters seem to easily brush off when they see horrifying things. They didn’t sell the paranoia at all.

  • And at a couple points Sadie finds potential proof of the monster’s existence but never does anything with it.
  • Perhaps there was some material left on the cutting room floor that fills in these gaps, but we may never know.
  • Still, this is a supernatural scare-fest that’s several cuts above average and I would truly recommend it for anyone who enjoys a decent story with their spooks.56 out of 76 found this helpful.

Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 5 /10 Not horrible, but not particularly engaging. I felt this was a mediocre movie. Some of the jump scares in the first half were pretty well done, but when the Boogeyman started to make a real appearance, the wheels came off for me.

  • I think the acting was pretty good but there was nothing original or special in this movie.
  • I feel that it’s difficult to make a truly scary movie that sticks with you long after you’ve left the theater; I was hoping The Boogeyman would stick to my bones a bit, but it did not.
  • If you’re looking to kill some time with some jump scares, this is an okay flick.

If you’re looking for something truly frightening and engaging, I don’t believe this is it.16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 6 /10 The acting and the jump scares are top knotch, but the story and the pacing was sloppy This could have been a great horror film.

  • The dread is there, the sets and lighting is perfect.
  • You never really get a good look at the creature, and I felt that worked towards making the film much more suspenseful.
  • The acting is all servicable and the characters feel real, for the most part.
  • My issue with the film was how closed up the father was towards his wifes death and talking with his daughters about it.

Seemed very unrealistic for how close they all seemed and only frustrated me in the end. The pacing was also very off. The opening seemingly took forever to get to any of the good stuff, and when it does get there, we’re thrown from scene to scene with almost no set up to it.

  • Some of it felt like they were just throwing ideas for scary scenes at us.
  • Almost as if they had no connection to the story other than the creature and the protaganists.
  • The film actually started out as a 1.5/5 stars but worked it’s way up to 3/5 by the end of it.
  • If the director and writers didn’t put the effort into making us care about the characters, then it would’ve stayed a 1.5, but thankfully, they grew on me and by the end of the film, I was hoping they would make it out alive.

Overall, not a bad film. Slightly above average, but just be aware that it is not a perfect horror film and it does have it’s fair share of problems and pacing issues throughout.3 bumps in the night out of 5.27 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.

  1. Permalink 3 /10 1h 38m, but felt much longer.
  2. Remember Boogeyman from 2005 (and its sequels)? This film, based on a Stephen King short story, not only has a very similar title, but it’s not a million miles away in terms of storyline either.
  3. It’s slightly better than the 2005 film, but since I gave that one a rating of 1/10, that’s not saying much.

The plot revolves around that old horror movie cliche, the monster in the closet (or under the bed). There’s a nasty creature killing emotionally troubled children, but only after it has had fun scaring them; young Sawyer Harper (Vivien Lyra Blair) will be its next victim unless older sister Sadie (Sophie Thatcher) can do something to stop it.

  1. Totally lacking in originality, The Boogeyman is instantly forgettable, generic, mainstream PG-13 horror that relies on predictable jump scares and loud noises to get any kind of reaction from its audience.
  2. The film reminded me of so many films in recent years – Mama, Smile, The Babadook, Lights Out, to name a few – with stock characters and an uninspired CGI creature.

Characters behave stupidly, no-one turns the lights on (a crazy woman would rather burn a few hundred dollars worth of candles than flick a switch), and Sadie faces the monster with a hockey stick when she has already seen it survive being blasted several times by a shotgun.3/10 – Further proof that they will make a film out of absolutely anything written by King.47 out of 80 found this helpful.

  1. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
  2. Permalink 4 /10 Rob Savage tries to improve his horror films, but unfortunately ends up in repetitions with clichés.
  3. The Boogeyman is a new horror thriller directed by Rob Savage, director of Host.
  4. The film is also based on a short story by Stephen King.
  5. The Harper family is still reeling from the tragic loss of their mother.

Teenage daughter Sadie (Sophie Thatcher) tries to support her younger sister Sawyer (Vivien Lyra Blair) through these tough times. Their father Will (Chris Messina) has withdrawn more into his work as a psychiatrist and is so little there for his daughters.

Through all their misery, they attract the sadistic entity of the Boogeyman, a creature that feeds on the misery of its victims until it takes their lives. With their father absent, Sadie tries to protect herself and her sister from this entity before he manages to feed on them. The director managed to make the simple but working horror film Host during the Covid pandemic.

With this film he kept it simple and cheap, for example by showing it as a found image way. With this movie he gets more chance to make a real movie. He seems to have a good vision for horror films, but still lacks his own style, because in this film he seems to have been inspired too much by other well-known horror films.

For example, he imitates many elements from this film more as a copy than he really makes it his own. For example, he ended up more with horror film filled with clichés. Horror connoisseurs can recognize many of these moments and compare them with the film that has done it before and sometimes better.

In the beginning he manages to build up the tension well by keeping the Boogeyman more in the dark shadows and working more with only scary sounds. When he later portrays the Boogeyman more, the film loses its mysterious sides and comes across as less scary.

  1. Because the creature no longer comes across as credible due to the lower quality, the film also loses more of its exciting and uncertain sides.
  2. This can make the film seem more predictable or long-winded at times.
  3. Besides the fact that the writers of the film have worked on better films such as A Quiet Place, they have also written more lesser films together without help, such as Haunt and 65 from earlier this year.

Due to the lesser script, the cast members also get few opportunities to do something with their roles. Sophie Thatcher and Vivien Lyra Blair are still at the beginning of their acting careers. Despite the fact that she did nice acting in various Star Wars series, it remains more on a standard side in this film.

  1. Thanks to the standard script, they also commit more of the horror clichés such as calling hello in a dark room and asking if someone is there when they hear strange noises.
  2. I rate the film as: together they also wrote more lesser films without help, such as Haunt and 65 from earlier this year.
  3. Due to the lesser script, the cast members also get few opportunities to do something with their roles.

Sophie Thatcher and Vivien Lyra Blair are still at the beginning of their acting careers. Despite the fact that she did nice acting in various Star Wars series, it remains more on a standard side in this film. Thanks to the standard script, they also commit more of the horror clichés such as calling hello in a dark room and asking if someone is there when they hear strange noises.

  • I rate the film as: together they also wrote more lesser films without help, such as Haunt and 65 from earlier this year.
  • Due to the lesser script, the cast members also get few opportunities to do something with their roles.
  • Sophie Thatcher and Vivien Lyra Blair are still at the beginning of their acting careers.

Despite the fact that she did nice acting in various Star Wars series, it remains more on a standard side in this film. Thanks to the standard script, they also commit more of the horror clichés such as calling hello in a dark room and asking if someone is there when they hear strange noises.

  1. I rate the film as: Despite the fact that she did nice acting in various Star Wars series, it remains more on a standard side in this film.
  2. Thanks to the standard script, they also commit more of the horror clichés such as calling hello in a dark room and asking if someone is there when they hear strange noises.

I rate the film as: Despite the fact that she did nice acting in various Star Wars series, it remains more on a standard side in this film. Thanks to the standard script, they also commit more of the horror clichés such as calling hello in a dark room and asking if someone is there when they hear strange noises.17 out of 23 found this helpful.

  • Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
  • Permalink 7 /10 Really good conventional horror The Boogeyman is a really good horror film that starts really strong and continues to have some good scares and a generally unnerving atmosphere, proving for both better and worse that Host & Dashcam director Rob Savage can also make a more conventional horror film.

Sophie Thatcher is so good, she essentially carries the film with the most emotional and layered performance enhanced by her tangible sisterly bond with Vivien Lyra Blair who is very convincing at conveying fear. Also worthy of a mention is David Dastmalchian whose brief appearance still leaves a lasting impression.

Rob Savage’s direction is impressive, he moves the camera in some inventive ways and shows the creature itself just the right amount, never completely revealing its look until the very end. The music by Patrick Jonsson is suitably sombre and oppressive without overdoing it.11 out of 16 found this helpful.

Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 6 /10 Imagine if the Babadook were remade as a 90s horror film While I give the film props for an interesting and unique creature design, it can’t really elevate a movie that just feels mediocre. The film presents itself as something of a metaphor for grief, but it ultimately feels extremely toned down and toothless.

  • Jump scares aside, the movie does very little to ratchet up its tension, making its handful of tense moments feel a bit like islands in a sea of “get on with it”.
  • The performances are fine, but ultimately the film never lets the characters really get to dig into their own trauma and depression in a way that might give the film some much needed depth.

It ends of feeling as if someone wanted to make the Babadook, but in the style of films like House on Haunted Hill or Thirteen Ghosts. It’s a pleasant enough watch, but you’ll forget it in a week.5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.

Permalink 2 /10 Is there a stronger word for generic? The Boogeyman is the genericest horror flick I’ve seen in a long time. Everything in it has been done a thousand times before. The only new idea involves a spherical light. Other than that, there is absolutely nothing you haven’t seen before, unless this is your first horror movie.

But I can still enjoy a generic movie if it’s made well. It can be argued that Smile is fairly generic, but it was done so well that it became my favorite movie of last year. The Boogeyman, on the other hand, is extremely boring and completely unscary.

You might be interested:  What Time Does Wing Stop Open?

I did not jump at a single jump-scare attempt. I never once felt creeped out. It’s also really dumb. I’ll give a couple examples. Apparently electricity is really expensive in this world. I’m basing this on the fact that there are numerous scenes where all the lights are off in situations that make zero sense to have the lights off.

An adolescent is hanging out in her room with all the lights off. A little kid is playing video games in the living room with all the lights off. Why? Then there is a scene where the light switches no longer work, but Christmas lights still do. Huh??? How about when the closet door slams not once, but twice, and the 10-year-old child decides to investigate instead of running out screaming? That’s normal child behavior, right? In my eyes, The Boogeyman is everything wrong with horror movies.

  1. From someone who loves the genre, please do better.
  2. 1 viewing, opening Thursday 6/1/2023) 41 out of 79 found this helpful.
  3. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
  4. Permalink 8 /10 What Hides In The Dark? The Boogeyman has some jump scares but a lot of the horror is also psychological, about how our fears may summon up a physical reality.

Sort of a tulpa that has been around for millennia. Maybe first summoned up when humans discovered fire and feared what hid in the daek beyond. Not just fear but grief may bring about the onset of the conditions which create The Boogeyman. High school student Sadie Harper (Sophie Thatcher) and her little sister Sawyer (Vivien Lyra Blair) are distraught after the recent death of their mother.

  1. Their father Will (Chris Messina), a therapist by profession, gives them neither the support nor the affection that they need.
  2. He tries but is crippled by his own pain and dense of loss which he refuses to verbalise.
  3. A disturbed patient shows up unexpectedly at their house asking for help, ends up committing suicide and brings in a strange entity that preys on the family and like a psychic vampire leeches off their greatest suffering.

The monster when it appears is quite effective, even terrifying but on prior scenes the dark corners where it lurks beforehand, barely glimpsed also work well. This film is based on a classic Stephen King story and carries more depth than such a trope normally would.

The lives of the children, their father and the disturbed patient are explored, no cardboard characters here, Good performances all round. Directed by Rob Savage from a screenplay by Scott Beck, Bryan Woods and Mark Heyman.8/10.24 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.

Permalink 3 /10 Possibly the Most Aggressively Mediocre Horror Film in Ages I’m a big fan of horror movies and can usually enjoy even the bad ones; they always have something for me to latch onto and personally, I’d prefer an offensively bad horror movie over a mediocre, forgettable one.

  • So when I say that The Boogeyman is so basic, so uninteresting, and so plain, that I don’t know if there’s anything particularly noteworthy about it, know that this is a really bad thing.
  • I’d rather schlock than what we got here.
  • This film is extremely paint-by-numbers and essentially follows the beats of countless spooky ghost story/curse/demon movies of the past.

It takes elements of Lights Out and Smile, mashes them together, yet also seems to take out any of the flavour and seasoning those films had. The narrative hook is done worse here, the monster looks worse here, the themes are less finely tuned to the story.

  1. We’ve seen SO MANY horror films tackle the themes of trauma and using it as an allegory before.
  2. Simply having “trauma” be an aspect of the story just doesn’t cut it in 2023.
  3. Not to mention that the need for the film to completely dark (because, ya know, the boogeyman doesn’t come out in the light) feels like a cheap way to save money on effects rather than a genuinely interesting concept.

The movie is quite bad looking as a result; it’s hard to tell what’s going on in action scenes, and yes, I understand it’s PG-13, but come on. You can have a PG-13 horror film and ALLOW US to see what’s going on. I’ll admit that Sophie Thatcher’s performance (as protagonist Sadie) is quite good and one of its only redeeming features.

Chris Messina is barely there; he might be fine, but honestly, his role (the hopelessly clueless parent) is so boring it’s laughable. I thought the younger girl, Sawyer (played by Vivien Blair) was actually pretty good as well and her and Thatcher have good chemistry. There are some good jump scares – albeit, if you’ve seen a horror movie before, you’ll see them coming – and unintentionally funny moments.

One of Sadie’s “friends” (heavy quotation marks), this blonde girl (Maddie Nichols) is one of the worst friends I think I’ve ever seen; she’s so callously cruel and heartless that it’s hard to imagine any of these girls (in THIS day and age especially) just excusing her behaviour.

  • But it is funny to see, I have to be honest.
  • Speaking of monsters (smooth transition), when I say the monster in this film sucks, I really mean it.
  • It’s not a good sign when audience members leave saying that they could probably fight it and win (this actually happened and yes I believed them).
  • The Boogeyman is a misstep and one of the most blah horror films I’ve seen in a while.

I had to do this review right after I saw it, because I know I’d forget everything about it in a week or two.23 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 6 /10 Not Scary at All. On The Lower End of All Cinematic Stephen King Adaptations This is, yet again, your very typical 21st Century Horror Theatrical Release.

This movie will remind you of countless others that you’ve seen for the last twenty or so years. The effects. The story. The presentation. It will all be boringly familiar to you. The fact that Stephen King’s name is attached to this project has little to no significance. So why did I rate this as highly as a six, you might ask? Because I love horror movies.

Even the dumb ones. Even the ones where my eyeballs get a tremendous workout from rolling so much during the course of the movie. This one here though does have a decent soundtrack with the likes of Beck and Elvis Presley, so there is that. The actors all do a decent job with the parts they are given.

  • Chris Messina does a decent job as the patriarch.
  • His performance from Julie & Julia still looms large (can’t believe I’m admitting this and in print!) Sophie Thatcher as the big sister really holds the film together and here reminds me so much of Anya Taylor-Joy.
  • And while I’m comparing actors, Messina also reminded me of Dermot Mulroney in this most recent performance.

This family endures a horrible tragedy at the onset of this film, but it is never shown, and only spoken of. As a matter of fact, there is a bit of confusion, at least there was for me, in the opening scene of this movie and to whom that incident relates to.

  • Look, this isn’t a horrible film. It’s not.
  • It’s just nothing fresh or different.
  • If you’re expecting that, and you may not be, you’ll be disappointed.
  • A highlight here as well is the fantastic David Dastmalchian.
  • He is always superb in his every role no matter how small or seemingly insignificant.
  • He can go from quirk to creep with an ease unparalleled by any of his peers working in films today.

The Boogeyman is thankfully just a short hour and a half give or take with no end credits scene. And as ridiculous as it may sound, I will watch this film again. I know. But I think it will play better on the small screen in late October and I’m looking forward to a repeat viewing at that time.27 out of 45 found this helpful.

Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 6 /10 Stephen King’s got something to say Full disclosure: I haven’t read the story on which “The Boogeyman” is based, so I can only assess it on its own merits. It was okay, as I expected. Like many horror movies of recent years, grief plays a major part of the plot.

Of course, most of the horror comes from jump scares. As for the cast, they do a fine enough job, considering what they have to have work. The title character does turn out to be freaky in some scenes. All in all, this is a movie that you’ll probably enjoy enough.

I wouldn’t say that there were any scenes that stuck me with solid memory, but you do have to admire the intense scenes. So, it’s nothing great, but if you’re willing to spend the day with some friends and watch something scary, this should be fun.7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.

Permalink 1 /10 no, no. no. Warning: Spoilers If you haven’t seen all and i mean all this before, then you never go to the movies. There is not one original moment to be seen. Every light switch seems to be broken, so every room is in the dark. Every room.

  1. Plus closets, attics, basements. Whatever.
  2. And yet people still go looking around. Looking.
  3. Strange noises don’t stop anyone.
  4. We have two psychiatrists on board.
  5. Both promising us that everything that’s happening is nonsense and in our imagination.
  6. I should have listened to you” someone says. I guess.
  7. The acting is pretty bad.

The father, chris messina, is sadly miscast. The two girls playing the daughters, do the best they can. Sadly, a sequel looks possible, if the box office numbers work. Save you money, please.19 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.

  • Permalink 2 /10 Lousy & Boring I can’t imagine a big studio like 20th Studios Fox investing in something so pedestrian that it needed to go to the theater.
  • This is a VERY dull flick which couldn’t decide whether to be arthouse A24 flick or a studio movie.
  • And it’s even harder to imagine an audience that would feel, what was suppose to be, horrified at the events that unravel in this flick.

Following the death of a mother and wife, a father, who is a psychiatrist, raises two children who are faced with grief and trauma. That’s it. Have you seen this before? In many, many, MANY iterations (“Hereditary” comes to mind). This boring trite flick has the audacity to use a childhood goblin known as The Boogeyman as the villain.

When, in reality, it is the dialogue. Holy Mother of mercy, the dialogue is atrocious. And I constantly pitied the actors that had to make the most mundane horror trope words seem plausible. It’s pretty much every line you can imagine. Paired with every dull shot (push in on door handle). Ugh. This movie stinks.

Also made worse that the actors seem like off brands. I found myself falling asleep repeatedly (during a matinee!) with a droning dream like sense. Perhaps this was the point. But the jump scares are also very cheap. Dreams within a dreams loud noises waking up in a hospital bed is so very tiresome.

I rolled my eyes at that one. I’m not sure what part is due to 1978 Stephen King short story. But.wow. Perhaps made in the late 70’s would’ve been more appropriate and groundbreaking. In 2023, it is a slog.15 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 1 /10 The “Bad Movie” Man Warning: Spoilers This movie was trash AF! First off, the monster was not a good design it was generic AF and looked like any old monster you would see in the cheapest video game.

Whoever designed that monster should be fired. The rules of the monster were completely incoherent.it was supposed to be boogeyman who scared kids and came out of the closet but instead it just followed the whole family around and it even attacked adults too – even after the film stated the rules of the monster were that that the boogieman attacked “kids who parents had failed to pay attention too” – but even then the dad was pretty proactive in taking care of his kids so there really wasn’t any logic to the story there.

  1. I guess they just made up that the monster can be “transferred” to a new family via It Follows or Smile which completely violates the rules of the entire premise – – – but whatever.
  2. Then, the monster was established to be “scared of the light” and stayed in the dark – so the heroes obviously do the genius thing to kept the lights in the house OFF the entire film and instead do stuff like light candles or hold onto blinking Christmas lights.

Because when a monster is scared of the light obviously you should just turn all the lights off and use the bare minimum light to give it as much room as possible to move around. Now there was the family who the monster had previously attacked and some lady is just sitting up in their old ruined home with candles and a shotgun talking about she is going to trap the monster with a tripwire to trigger some shotgun pellets.but the monster was previously said to be made of “shadows” so how the heck is a shotgun pellet going to work? And why is she just up in some house anyhow? The monster isn’t even there.

  1. Go get some therapy lady, or maybe get OUT of the house and go FIND the new victims and try to STOP the monster there.
  2. Then there was the teenage girl protagonist and her angst over her dead mother – which was a wound that the monster had nothing to do with.
  3. The monster didn’t kill her mom.
  4. The monster was supposed to go attack the little girl – as established in the promise of the premise- but instead the monster stopped following the little girl and followed the teenager – which didn’t make any sense because teenagers – by and large – aren’t scared of monsters in the closet.

The Boogeyman was a sloppy remake of Smile and It Follows using the name of Stephen King’s The Boogeyman. It completely sucked – the characters were painful – the cinematography was trash – and it’s not scary even in the slightest. If there ever is a monster in the closet, surely it can do no worse to its victims than make them watch this lazy, incoherent, miserable, generic film.15 out of 28 found this helpful.

Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 1 /10 Couldn’t wait for it to end. Warning: Spoilers Boring and a waste of time. This was actually worse than the 2005 “Boogeyman” movie. I don’t even know why this movie was called “The Boogeyman” as it wasn’t even really a man, more of a creature. It looked like some creature from “A Quite Place” that got lost and ended up in this little girl’s closet.

I don’t even think we learned what it was or where it came from. Just that it’ll make mold grow in your house and it has two baby arms that come out of it’s mouth when it’s about ready to kill you. That’s it! I was hoping this would be good, better than the 05′ version but it’s not.

I heard this was supposed to go on Hulu instead of to the theaters and that’s exactly where it belongs. Buried somewhere under Hulu’s horror tab.14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 5 /10 Middle of the road The Boogeyman is a movie I was actually super excited for, having seen the trailer before this year’s Renfield starring Nicolas Cage, and it falls in the same field as Smile does to me, except with a bit more narrative about family written in.

This movie doesn’t do anything we haven’t seen before, falling into all the classic tropes of modern horror, dead relative, siblings, single father, school bullies, everything else, and on top of that, it just wasn’t very scary, often times replacing what could’ve been well crafted suspense with cheap jumpscares.

  1. It did have some great performances and some neo-noir type cinematography, but the ending fell extremely flat and it ultimately feels like a movie we’ve seen 100 times before.
  2. C- 8 out of 14 found this helpful.
  3. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
  4. Permalink 4 /10 I had no idea houses in the US apparently have no lights.

Warning: Spoilers I have seen some boogeyman movies and i must say this was maybe the worst. Not because of the acting or directing or cinematography or lore or the monster but because the absolutely stupid characters and their decisions. The unrealistic insane decisions made by the family members are just beyond ridiculous.

  • Older sister and younger learns about the monster they know only the light keeps it away and what they don’t do? They never ever turn on the lights in the house! Like what is happening?? She also plays in total darkness with PS.
  • WHen she is pranked and closed in the room does she turn on the light? No! Also father is a psychiatrist and after seeing her daughter terrified like hell he lets her still sleep alone still in the same room.

Like even when at the last act they go after the monster they still none of them have a single flashlight! Lady who sets a trap cuts of the electric power of the lights instead turning it off so she can shot it with shotgun. Either houses in the US have no lights or the main characters are the dumbest in the history of horror movies.

The equivalent of this movie would be a movie when a family learns about a killer shark in the bay and they only have to avoid going ito the water and yet every day they decide to rather go to the beach and swim the sea.9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 2 /10 Skip it Skip it.

Trust me. I took my 16 yo because he actually wanted to see it, he liked it, said it got his blood pumping. I’m happy for him, it’s good “gateway horror” for the young or those who aren’t fans of horror, If you’re a horror fan, stay away. Far, far away.

I was extremely bored. The jump scares were just really loud music to make you jump, I was hoping for more since the girl from Yellowjackets was in it. The best part of the movie was the little girl from Kenobi. I was just hoping for more. Update – I’ve read others reviews on the movie now that it’s been out a few days, I don’t know what the heck people are talking about the cinematography, it was too dark to see anything! The story was lame, it’s been fine before, I’m sticking with my it’s ok “gateway” horror to get kids interested or for those who don’t like traditional horror movies.31 out of 52 found this helpful.

Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 3 /10 slow and uneventful A film that seems to rely on jump scares more than anything else. The first half hour is a slow burn and nothing really happens. Guy sees a therapist and his first response is to call a hospital to unburden his patient on to them instead.

  1. His daughter tries to confide her feelings to him and he says “you have a therapist dr soandso right? You should tell her about it (instead of me although I am meant to be a therapist too and your dad).
  2. Ok so that’s the first half hour of the film with a few vague jump noises and creepy music but you are wondering where is this leading to.

Lots of references to a monster in a closet which might be scary to any 8 yr old watching this. If you are older than 8 yrs you might as well skip the first half hour. Considering that’s already 1/3 of the film we aren’t really off to a good start are we? The daughters therapist then has her session with the daughter claiming if we are scared of something the best thing to do is face it.

How clichee and outdated. I am already bored to death and thinking what century was this directed in but ok at least it leads to a creepy atmosphere even though I completely disagree with that kind of approach to good therapy at least it should provide a good horror film. But does it? No idea, next 10 minutes are too dark to make out anything properly with us getting introduced to the dark thing next whatever that is since it is too dark to see it even if they showed it.

Ok so half way through the film and still nothing has happened. The dark thing is identified as the boogeyman next. It needs to dark to stay hidden. That follows since this whole film has been complete darkness so far. I watched till 2/3 of the film then gave up.

  1. Complete waste of time.
  2. Maybe something meaningful happens in the last 30 minutes but I doubt it.
  3. To sum it up if you can sit through the whole film without falling asleep you deserve a medal.
  4. That would be the only reason to watch this atrocity.5 out of 6 found this helpful.
  5. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.

Permalink 4 /10 Squandered potential, poorly written. Warning: Spoilers Went into this movie with little expectations and was actually pleasantly surprised with how well they pulled off the boogeyman character, all the special effects, jump scares and creepy moments.

  • Ontop of that all the acting was extremely well executed everyone committed to their character and really delivered pretty strong performances.
  • Special nods to the main character and the man that played billings.
  • That’s about all the positive things I have to say about this movie though and that’s where our spoilers will begin.

First off the little girl who pee’d in her pants the one time the lights went off in the therapist office is incredibly inconsistent with how afraid she is. When she first sees the boogeyman she actually has the nerve to continue investigating it, BY HERSELF, MULTIPLE TIMES, IN THE DARK WHICH SHE IS SUPPOSEDLY TERRIFIED OF.

  • There’s just little consistency to any decision she makes, right down to the end where she is playing her video games in a room with 0 lights on despite the fact she again, is terrified of the dark.
  • No child that age would be sleeping alone, especially in her own room with door closed after seeing the boogeyman haunting her MULTIPLE times.

Now onto the dad who is by far the worst character. He’s actually a therapist by trade but is the worst dad you’ve ever seen. Instead of consoling his daughters he just pawns them off on another therapist right after their mom died and man supposedly committed suicide in their house.

  • Get a clue moron.
  • He’s nowhere to be found in the house at all times despite his daughters constantly screaming and crying.
  • Right down to the end where his 6 year old is being tossed like a rag doll around the living room and he somehow shows up about 10 seconds too late.
  • Somehow this moron still isn’t buying the story despite the fact his daughter fliped the couch and suicide torpedoed into the living room TV.

Even after the daughters extreme head injury, he brings her home from the hospital about 2 hours later as she knocked out in the backseat with no seatbelt on. Dad of the year. I swear in the climax of the movie we see this man straight up snap his leg like a twig yet his daughters who combined weigh less than half of him are able to assist him in walking all the out of the house from the basement.

  1. Later in the final scene not only is his leg not broken but he’s not even limping or wearing a brace.
  2. What? The older daughter also makes some incredibly questionable moves as well.
  3. The town they must live in must be about the size of a college campus as she can easily walk to and from school, from her house to the billings residence and from the billings residence to the hospital.

All within a very small amount of time. After watching the boogeyman eat about a half dozen 12 gauge shot gun rounds point blank and rip a woman in a half (another character who is making insanely bad choices such as burning more candles than the entirety of all the churches in America, or completely giving up on any sort of cleaning or even keeping the backdoor of her house shut) she declares to her younger sister (who is wrapped in Christmas lights that are plugged in and working despite all the power in the house not working) that she can kill the boogeyman and proceeds to attempt to do so armed with a hockey stick.

  • There’s more plot holes and poor writing littered about such as billings who is terrified of closets and the boogeyman deciding he going to into the closet and get killed by him? What? Honestly if I went over all the poor writing we would be her for about another 2000 characters.
  • This movie gets a 4 because the acting really is good despite the awful script, and there are actually a lot of creepy well done horror scenes in this movie.

I would probably even watch it again because it kind of works as a dark comedy if you riff on the poor writing as you watch it.23 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 7 /10 The Darkness is its Own Fear Itself The Boogeyman (2023) is about a family of a male therapist who has to raise his two daughters by himself.

  1. He meetups with clients in his house until one day that this mysterious client appears.
  2. The mysterious client commits suicide inside their house while leaving a dark entity in the house with the family.
  3. The family of three start to endure the pain of the entity that brings to the family.
  4. It is up to them to stop the mysterious entity once and for all.

I went to see an early access screening of The Boogeyman (2023) in a select theater, and I thought it was good. The first impression of the movie that it does deliver a slow burn, but it still delivers. The suspense and buildup of the movie itself and the character’s dialogue of Sadie (Sophie Thatcher), Sawyer (Vivien Lyra Blair), and Will Harper (Chris Messina) are all important to the end.

  • It was great to see the 1973 short story being adapted to the big screen as Stephen King’s mind portrays fantasizing monsters come to life.
  • The monster reveal was creepy and entertaining to watch at the same time.
  • Ing does deliver a hidden theme of when we are all scared of the dark as well.
  • The Boogeyman writers are the same minds who made A Quiet Place (2018) and director Rob Savage that made the movie horrific to say the least.

Overall, The Boogeyman is good with its acting, suspense, and horror. I would recommend watching it in theaters for a good horror-thriller watch.15 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 5 /10 Not Bad, But Lacks Impact Warning: Spoilers Having only heard of the short story by Stephen King when seeing previews of this film & of course seeing the other 3 Boogeyman Films (not too sure if they were based off of the short story), I went into this one apprehensive.! The film sees a widower & his 2 daughters living in a dark house after the passing of his wife/mum.

  1. The father, who is a counselor, has a patient who comes to him one day unannounced & tells him of seeing The Boogeyman who killed his kids.
  2. It is then, he kills himself & strange things begin to occur in the house soon after, can the family stop this creature before it’s too late!? I found the film to be not bad.

I mean, it’s good, but it lacks impact for me. The jump scares weren’t bad & the dark house really provided some potential, which was used well enough but could’ve been better. The story isn’t bad, but could’ve used depth, the family were developed enough, but the other characters were just there & looked to be disposable body counts which by the way never happened as there was only a body count of 3.? The film is 1 hour & 32 minutes without credits, but feels longer as the pacing is pretty stretched.

The film could’ve been shorter by about 10 minutes. Short story, short film. Makes sense, doesn’t it? The film wasn’t as such boring, but lacked meatiness, this is despite the fact that there’s some good visuals & not bad scares. I can’t exactly put my finger on what it was that made the film feel empty or a bit dull but there was something.

The Boogeyman design was ok, but somewhat cheesy looking. The ending wasn’t bad, but a bit anti climatic. Overall, it’s not a bad film, it’s say, better than what’s been coming out recently this year. But it lacks something to give it impact. A higher body count, graphic deaths may have been a good idea to beef this film up a bit.

The runtime is a little long for a short story & the pacing didn’t help with this. The main characters are good enough, but the others were generic & boring, they could’ve been potential for a body count but that was missed. The visuals are good & the scares aren’t too bad, this is despite The Boogeyman looking a tad bit comical for a serious horror film.

Give this one a watch, but don’t expect much.5/10.8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink 1 /10 Oh God. This film is nothing but a collection of cheap jump-scares stringed together by a subpar plot that would have been old if it were released 20 years ago.

I don’t mind jump-scares, in fact I think they can be a great addition to a horror movie if used well, but making a loud noise or loudly slamming a door every 3 minutes is just lazy writing. Not gonna go into detail (not that there are much details to go into) but the whole movie is riddled with every horror movie trope you can think of.

I found myself constantly rolling my eyes over how nonsensical and unrealistic the characters were being in behaving and reacting to the events of the film. This film is regurgitated garbage that has been many times before and I promise you, if you’ve seen any monster-horror movie ever, you’ve seen this one.21 out of 34 found this helpful.

Who does The Boogeyman prey on?

The Bogeyman (also spelled ” Boogeyman “, ” Bogieman “, and/or ” Boogieman “) is the archetype of the creature type known as Bogeymen (also spelled ” Bogiemen “, ” Boogeymen “, and/or ” Boogiemen “) – a monster that is designed as a tool to scare children into good behavior or to protect them from harm: the Bogeyman himself is a formless being that can take any shape the storyteller wishes though he tends to be a grotesque humanoid with a tendency to hide under beds, in closets and other dark places.

The Bogeyman is said to only go after naughty children and his punishments are said to vary from mischievous pranks such as pulling hair, biting toes or shaking beds (akin to a poltergeist) or more malevolent behavior such as manifesting as horrible creatures to scare the child or even going as far as kidnapping the child and taking them away to his shadowy realm to an undisclosed fate (though he is often said to eat them).

The Bogeyman is related to many similar beings – who, together, form an entire villain type in themselves: however he is definitely the most infamous of them all and is especially prominent in Western cultures. Even to this day, some people will use the Bogeyman to scare children into good behavior, though it is becoming less popular due to negative effects it can bring to some children – fear of the Bogeyman is also a natural part of children’s development and it is very common for children to go through a period of fear over the Bogeyman in the closet or under their bed: usually people grow out of this fear when they grew older but the few who don’t can suffer the curse of the Bogeyman for their entire lives (unless they are fortunate enough to get help in conquering this fear—Like the boy In the film ” Boogeyman “).

What are the abilities of The Boogeyman?

Powers – Fear Inducement Superhuman Strength Umbrakinesis: The Boogeyman has the ability to generate and manipulate darkness, deactivated photons mostly in the absence of light. He can even deactivate and repulse or travel through shadows by converting deactivated photons into a dark version of a portal. : Boogeyman