What Does The Bible Say About Cussing?

26.07.2023 0 Comments

Does it say not to cuss in the Bible?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Matthew 5:35–36
← 5:34 5:37 →
“Sermon on the Mount” ( Bergpredigt ), by Friedrich Petersen (1927).
Book Gospel of Matthew
Christian Bible part New Testament

Matthew 5:35 and Matthew 5:36 are the thirty-fifth and thirty-sixth verses of the fifth chapter of the Gospel of Matthew in the New Testament, They are part of the Sermon on the Mount, These verses are part of either the third or fourth antithesis, the discussion of oaths, Jesus tells his listeners in Matthew 5:34 “to swear not at all” and in here presents examples of unacceptable swearing.

Is swearing a blasphemy?

Some of Jesus’ enemies refused to believe that He was the Son of God, and attempted to kill Him ‘for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God’ (John 10:33). Cursing is one form of blasphemy, because it treats God casually and ignores His glory and honor.

Is it okay to swear?

– Experts say cursing can act as a coping mechanism to a variety of different adverse events. “The way swearing works, in these circumstances, is as a form of coping mechanism to deal with the emotional consequences of various difficult situations, especially those we have little or no control over and that cause us to feel disappointed, that we’ve been treated, experience persistent or acute physical pain, and so on,” Antonino said.

Antonino said humans are resilient to adversity in part because we’ve developed ways to cope, regardless of whether such coping responses will actually be helpful in changing a person’s circumstances. He explained that, in situations when nothing really can be done to “resolve” our issue — like when we receive a very annoying email from our boss or learn of yet another spike in COVID-19 cases in our area — there may not be a single effective action we can take to fix the problem.

“But swearing in these circumstances can represent an important way of releasing the difficult emotional reactions provoked by such events,” he said. In other words, firing off some four-letter words when things are bad won’t actually help make the situation better, but it does offer a bit of respite that could be enough to help us weather a brief storm.

And while some research suggests swearing more can dull its pain-reducing effects, Antonino said it can help build our resilience in the face of potential new adverse circumstances we have little control over. “It’s important to point out that although swearing will not resolve our issues practically, it can help calm and resolve our internal emotional imbalance caused by those experiencing these external issues,” he said.

“In essence, swearing can be an effective short-term emotion-regulation tool.” Zrenchik said there are other benefits, including creative expression, relationship development, or simply allowing our identities to harmonize. “Most people swear, whether they admit it or not.

They may not swear in front of others, but most people swear,” Zrenchik said. “When people are forced to talk differently when interacting with people than when they talk to themselves or close friends, they develop two competing ‘identities,'” he said. But by allowing ourselves the freedom to swear when talking to others, like we do when we talk to ourselves, Zrenchik said it allows people the freedom to live a bit more authentically and honestly.

This not only creates greater congruence of identity, but also helps develop relationships. “It signals to each person that they can relax, be themselves, and speak freely without fear. We tend to ‘watch our language’ around people we cannot fully be ourselves around,” he said.

Conversely, shared swearing allows us a way to know we are amongst friends. Then, we are more equipped to build an honest and authentic relationship,” Zrenchik said. But there’s a difference between swearing with someone and swearing at someone. While there’s actual evidence to back up the unrelenting urge to shout a few bad words into the abyss, that’s where it should go — not to the person scanning your items at a grocery store or the person who isn’t driving to your exacting standards.

Those four-letter words are best reserved for the ether. Or you can use them in the form of creative expression under the protection of the First Amendment. “Swearing is not just about expressing anger. It can also be an expression of creativity. Some swearing is simply creative,” Zrenchik said.

  1. Zrenchik said cussing has numerous benefits when used appropriately, from using “f*ck” in protest chants to women’s groups calling themselves Stitch ‘n B*tch,
  2. And the 1,000 different ways people turn swear words into funny, inspiring, and ingenious phrases is nothing short of a creative medium,” Zrenchik said.

F*ck yeah it is.

What does it mean to swear in the Bible?

: to put a hand on the Bible and make a formal promise to tell the truth.

Do Christians say oh my God?

“Oh my God! ” The expression, once considered taboo in polite conversation, has become as commonplace as “that’s cool” or “see you later”. “Oh my God!” The expression, once considered taboo in polite conversation, has become as commonplace as “that’s cool” or “see you later” in American parlance.

The acronym, OMG, is nearly as ubiquitous. Room-chatters rely on it, so do text-messagers. The search engine Yahoo now uses OMG as the name of a gossip-alert service. It’s a sign of a free-speech society, right? Say what you want when you want. But for many, the omnipresent phrase sounds like a sinful swipe at the Almighty.

Or at least another iceberg of disrespect cracking away from the icecap of civility. Rosie Brecevic catches herself midsentence and says, instead, “Oh my gosh!” “You try to pick a better way to say it,” says the kindergarten teacher from Colorado Springs, especially this time of year and “in front of the little children.” Boutique employee Vera Abel says she can’t imagine anyone ever uttering the phrase.

As she moves merchandise from spot to spot, she invokes one of the Ten Commandments: “You shall not call the name of your Lord God in vain.” The Rev. Patrick Gray agrees with Brecevic and Abel. Curate of the Church of the Advent in Boston, Gray preached a sermon on the subject earlier this year. He exhorted his flock: “There’s one thing, or type of thing, that you’ll never hear me say.

And for some reason, it still makes me feel a little bit uncomfortable when I hear someone else do it. If I learned anything in my Baptist upbringing, it’s that you never, ever say, ‘Oh my God!’ in casual conversation.” He finds other words. But others, such as Brian Gibson, don’t see a need to hold back.

Playing with his son in Langley, Va., Gibson says, “I always say, ‘Oh my God!’ ” He’s aware that the phrase occasionally rubs people the wrong way. “Some people are more religious than others,” he says. Oh my God is everywhere It’s impossible to muddle through a day without hearing someone — even on the public airwaves — call on a higher being for a lower purpose.

Just recently: • Hannah Storm cried out, “Oh my God!” during her final telecast as a co-host of “The Early Show” on CBS. • Defensive tackle Warren Sapp said this about legendary NFL quarterback Brett Favre: “Oh my God. I want to know what he’s drinking and eating.” • Charles Gibson said “Oh my God” while questioning Hillary Clinton.

  • On Yahoo, there’s a spirited debate about the name of the new OMG service on one of the message boards.
  • A user writes: “This is taking the Lord’s name in vain, and while I’m fairly certain you could care less about that, I can no longer support Yahoo if they insist on keeping this OMG product.
  • It shows the height of insensitivity to people of faith.” To which another user replies: “Lighten up, it’s just an instant messaging phrase.

If you find that kind of thing offensive, you should unplug your ethernet cable right now and stay off the Internet.” And then someone makes the point: “There is no doubt what the OMG stands for. Every Christian should be outraged that the name of the Lord is used with such disrespect.

  1. The point is that people use his name as an insignificant figure of speech.” Officially, Yahoo avoids the conflict altogether.
  2. The name ‘OMG’ is derived from IM speak and means ‘wow!’ ” says company spokesman Carrie Davis.
  3. Profane vs.
  4. Obscene Stanley Hauerwas, a religion professor at Duke Divinity School, takes a different slant.

He has been known to liberally salt his everyday speech with profanities. Lingua Franca magazine once called him “a foul-mouthed theologian.” He says that when he hears people say, “Oh my God,” “it’s a cry not of profanity or vulgarity. It usually has the grammar of a lament.

You’d have to outlaw the Psalms if you wanted to do away with laments.” Timothy Jay, author of “Cursing in America” and “Why We Curse,” says that according to his research, ” ‘Oh my God’ is in the top 10 of expletives. It is used five times as much by women as by men.” Oddly enough, Jay says, research has also shown that “Oh my God” is often a euphemism for something else.

Hauerwas agrees: “Instead of ‘Oh my God,’ I prefer ‘Oh,’ ” In fact, our culture is more tolerant of profanities than obscenities. The Federal Communications Commission, for example, draws distinctions between profane language (traditionally defined as irreverence toward God) and obscene material (defined by the FCC as material that describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way).

Most profanities and vulgarities are allowed on the air at certain times of day, but obscenities are not. Oh my God’s evolution In many societies throughout history, it has been taboo to speak the name of God. In Christendom, euphemisms — like “zounds” (God’s wounds), “golly” (God’s body) and “gosh” — evolved.

The Oxford English Dictionary defines “gosh” as a “mincing pronunciation of God.” Historically, sanctions against certain expressions “focused mainly on religion,” Jay says. “People were punished for depravity because they said something scurrilous about the church.” Over time in the United States, authorities gave up on the prevention of anti-church epithets, Jay says.

  1. A major shift in emphasis came in the late 1960s when the Motion Picture Association of America began rating movies.
  2. Television and radio followed suit.
  3. These days lawmakers are focused on prohibiting sexual and biological word-darts (George Carlin’s seven dirty words) and hateful epithets.
  4. Letting it slip by Taking the Lord’s name in vain was denounced again this year by the Vatican, but some religious institutions are softening their stances.

Take St. Clare of Montefalco Catholic School in Grosse Pointe Park, Mich. The principal, Sister Kathy Avery, read to students a list of words that are unacceptable on the playground. Asked if the phrase “Oh my God!” is on Avery’s list, a school employee says, “We don’t encourage that, but it’s not on Sister Kathy’s list of swear words.” The first written record of the word “God” in English, according to the OED, is from the 9th century.

Gosh” enters the lexicon 900 years later. In 1804, one writer observed that “by gosh” is the “most elegant and classical oath imaginable.” And so there are two kinds of people in the world: those who say “Oh my God!” and those who say something else. Even atheists have been known to cry, “Oh my God!” on occasion.

“Sure!” says Eric Mintz, Web master of the Ask an Atheist Web site. “I say it all the time.”

What is swearing falsely in the Bible?

description –

In oath religious precept, and (2) a false oath, in which one uses the name of God to swear falsely, thus committing a sacrilege. At the time of Jesus in the 1st century ce, oaths were often misused and, for that reason, were often rebuked in early Christianity. In Islam a person

Is OMG a blasphemy?

Does Texting ‘OMG’ Amount to Blasphemy? Sept.23, 2009 — – As texting and instant messaging became a way of life, a shorthand lexicon emerged to save time and stress on fingers. Acronyms like LOL and TTYL replaced “laughing out loud” and “talk to you later.” The letters OMG replaced “Oh, My God.” Or did it? There’s debate on what the G in OMG really means.

Does it stand for “gosh,” or “God”? If it stands for “God,” is using it a sin? John Donvan spoke to a group of high school students from the Washington Hebrew Congregation youth group in Bethesda, Md., about OMG and how it relates to the third commandment, which says, according to the King James version of the Bible, “Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain” (Exodus 20:7).

There are various interpretations of the commandment, but it is commonly defined as using the Lord’s name casually or irreverently. Saying “Jesus Christ!” in any way other than in praise is one example. Watch the full story on “Nightline” at 11:35 p.m.

ET OMG has a number of meanings ranging from excitement to disbelief. For a vast number of American teens, it has replaced the exclamation mark. “You don’t think that you’re saying ‘Oh, my God,'” said Rachel Edelman, 15. “You’re just thinking ‘Oh!’ like it’s a surprise. OMG. It’s nothing to be thought about.” Lexi Levin, 18, describes herself as “an avid OMG user in text,” and she thinks using OMG is a long way from “Oh, my God.” To her, it’s akin to golly, gee and gosh.

“That’s kind of how I think about it. I don’t know if that’s a fair way to think about it. But it’s how I make myself feel better.” Julian Schneider, 14, agrees. “If you say something like ‘Oh my God,’ then you’re using His name in vain, but if you’re saying something like OMG it’s not really using the Lord’s name in vain because you’re not saying ‘Oh my God.’ It’s more like ‘Wow.

Really?'” For hundreds of years, people have found ways to avoid using the Lord’s name in vain. Words like gosh and golly, both dating back to the 1700s, served as euphemisms for God. It is a Jewish tradition to write “G_d” to show respect. Exclamations like “Oh, my God” and “Jesus Christ” were rarely used in polite conversation and drew rebuke when they were.

But that has changed in recent decades and art is imitating life. The Parents Television Council reports that in 2007, the most recent year for which they have data, 95.9 percent of uses of the word God on primetime network television were in vain.

Which country swears the most?

Cursing countries which swear the most – and the least – Now we know who has the biggest range of swear words to choose from, we’ve looked at who uses them the most. Using Google search data, we have identified which countries citizens are most likely to swear online based on the number of users and population. Countries who swear the most: 1. France2. Poland3. Australia4. New Zealand5. Spain6. Czechia7. United States8. Italy9. Canada10. United Kingdom Coming out on top as the most likely to use explicit language online is France, The French have 7.59% – or seven in every 100 people – using curse words online per year. At the bottom of the scale, the Philippines was the country least likely to swear online. This comes as little surprise as they have a range of laws to prohibit explicitly online. Obviously, there is a place and a time for profanity, and that isn’t on the TV screens and radio airwaves while children are around.

The watershed is designed to allow certain words and images which aren’t suitable for younger viewers to be broadcast. Each country has a different watershed and different laws surrounding what can and can’t be broadcast even when restrictions are over. Generally, the list of prohibited words starts with the so-called ‘seven dirty words’ coined in America in 1972, but regulatory bodies in each country add to this list.

In the UK, regulators such as Ofcom have a set code and guidelines of what is allowed after the watershed is in place. The country with the longest watershed period is Spain, theirs begins at 9 pm and ends at 7 am giving viewers ten hours of unrestricted language in their broadcasting. Finland however, only has five hours of unrestricted programming with one of the latest watershed starting times of midnight.

The earliest times for profanity on TV is at 8.30 pm in Australia and New Zealand. Although their watershed begins at least half an hour before any other countries which is still an hour later than the average child’s bedtime in the country which stands at 7.30 pm. Language is forever changing, with new words being added into our dictionary, and old words disappearing from our vocabulary.

It’s hard to imagine some of the explicit language used today ever going unused, but hundreds of shocking words from the Victorian era and even before have been lost over time. “Windy-wallets” was a term that was used to describe someone who boasts too much and shows off. One term that is possibly still understood today is “yellowbelly” which means a coward but was considered an expletive back in the day. While there are plenty of NSFW words you might imagine for a foul-mouthed person now, in the Victorian they were referred to as a “muckspout”.

You might be interested:  What Does Tumble Dry Mean?

What did God swear?

  • Berry Kercheville
  • October 2, 2022

Podcast: Download (30.5MB) Overcoming Apostasy: When God Swore by Himself Hebrews 6:13-20 Introduction: Please notice that verse 13 of our text begins with “for.” Our writer and preacher is now transitioning from one of the strongest warnings of falling away to one of the strongest motivations.

  1. The Transition from Warning to Promises (6:9-12)
    1. The preacher is aware of his strong rebuke in 5:11–6:8 when he states n 6:9, “Though we speak in this way in your case we feel sure of better things” The preacher knows that the warning he has given is bold and strong. He does not apologize for the sternness, but truly believes in these brethren that they will do better. That statement alone is a lesson,
    2. The writer ended his sermon with, “I appeal to you brothers, bear with my word of exhortation” (13:22). Can we “bear with” the strong warnings Old and New Testaments writers deliver to us without complaining that we have our feelings hurt? God is direct with us and plain spoken. It is the reason This preacher loves these brethren, and wants to save them from destruction.
    3. Those “better things” are summarized in verse 12: not being sluggish, but following the pattern of those who through faith and patience in inherit the promises, The emphasis is on three words: faith, patience, & promises. “Faith and patience” is the focus of the end of chapter 10 through the middle of chapter 12.
    4. However, in our text, the primary focus is on the promises of God, In other words, the words of verse 11 are the reason the preacher has spoken so sternly. We desire” Why does he and his fellows desire to show the same “earnestness/diligence” to the end just as they had in the past? — verse 13: ” for when God made a promise”
  2. The Blessing
    1. It should first be of interest to us that the promise to which the preacher refers was made 2000 years previous to his sermon in Hebrews. Consider: 2000 years previous, God made a promise. We now live 4000 years after the promise was made. When we think of God making a promise so long ago, it highlights two phrases in our text:
      1. 6:12 “imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises,”
      2. 6:15 “Thus Abraham, having patiently waited, obtained the promise.”
      3. Now, do we understand what God means by “patience?” Why would God cause his people to endure and wait such a long time? Hebrews 11:6 says it well, “Without faith, it is impossible to please him.”
    2. The quoted blessing comes from Genesis 22:16-17 just following Abraham’s faith and obedience in offering Isaac on the altar. Abraham illustrated his faith and loyalty to God by not allowing any earthly love to come in the way of his love and loyalty to God. This is the occasion in which the promised blessing is made, The “offspring” of Abraham would be those who followed in his footsteps (Romans 4:13).
    3. The specific blessing of Genesis 22:17 is making a great nation from his offspring (the kingdom of Christ) and, “your offspring shall possess the gate of their enemies.” This promise primarily refers to the land promise, indicating the security of God’s people. It is the ” rest ” of chapter four. It is not that the enemies no longer exist, but that they no longer can “possess our gates.” They have been conquered and can no longer conquer us. In other words, Satan has been bound – “Nothing unclean will ever enter it, nor anyone who does what is detestable or false, but only those who are written in the Lamb’s book of life” (Rev.21:27).
  3. The Oath
    1. First, notice the oath itself in verse 14. Modern versions render, “Surely I will bless you and multiply you.” However, both the Greek and Hebrew are better represented by the KJV, NKJV, & ASV: “Blessing I will bless you and multiplying I will multiply you.” The repetition and the oath language of the Hebrew makes it the strongest way the Hebrew could make an affirmation.
    2. The preacher’s emphasis is on the fact that God took an oath, What are we to see from this shocking statement?
      1. First, when a person takes an oath he would swear by an authority greater than himself. But with God, no one can supersede him. Therefore, he swears by himself. It is like he said, “I swear by me.” We would laugh to hear that in a court of law.
      2. Further, that God took an oath is almost humorous. Why would God take an oath? He has never lied; he has never failed to keep a promise. He could just say, “I promise.” An oath is taken when there is doubt as to its fulfillment. But with God there is no doubt.
      3. Most importantly, when one makes an oath he puts himself under a curse of utter destruction by the one whose name he swears. Thus, when God swears by himself, he is saying, “May I being utterly destroyed if I do not keep this promise.” Therefore, verse 16 states that once God swore, that was the end of the matter!
  4. The Graciousness of God’s Oath
    1. Obviously, God did not make his oath because he needed to keep himself from being tempted to violate his promise. The oath was totally and completely for our sake,
      1. Verse 17 shows God’s purpose: “So when God desired to show more convincingly the unchangeable character of his purpose” Look again at the words of 6:11, ” full assurance of hope,” God wanted us to be absolutely confident of our hope. And his reason for giving us this confidence was so we would not give up; we would not become sluggish, but maintain earnestness and diligence until the end.
      2. Verse 18 gives further emphasis: “that we might have strong encouragement to hold fast to the hope.”
      3. Then finally, this promise and oath (” by two unchangeable things “) are now a ” sure and steadfast anchor for the soul.” Those wonderful words address something we have all experienced – a feeling of discouragement that our salvation is not sure and steadfast. We think that the failures of our life somehow mitigate the promises of God. We must remember that later in 10:19 & 10:26 give the contrast between confidence and defeat. “We can boldly enter,” but “if we go on sinning willfully, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins.” Our job is to be diligent and patiently endure and reject continuous and willful sin.
    2. Melchizedek
      1. The preacher had interrupted his speech back in 5:10 when he desired to explain the importance of Jesus being a priest like Melchizedek. Now he can further his explanation.
      2. An anchor is only as good as the surety to that which it is attached. I have been in many a boat where the anchor slipped. However, in this case, the anchor extends beyond the veil into the Most Holy Place, the very presence of God. But the key phrase is, “where Jesus has gone as a forerunner on our behalf.”
      3. In other words, our anchor extends to the place where Jesus has gone “on our behalf.” Look at 7:23-25 “The former priests were many in number, because they were prevented by death from continuing in office, but he holds his priesthood permanently, because he continues forever. Consequently, he is able to save to the uttermost those who draw near to God through him, since he always lives to make intercession for them.”
      4. The above text tells us why we can have “strong encouragement to hold fast” and that we have a “sure and steadfast anchor of the soul.” Since he is a priest like Melchizedek, a permanent priesthood that continues forever, consequently, he can save to the uttermost (completely and at all times), since he always lives to make intercession,
      5. 10:2 tells us that being completely cleansed in Jesus rather than by the sacrifices of the old Law, “the worshiper no longer has any consciousness of sins. ” In other words, the sins of the past are cleansed leaving the worshiper without any need to ever be concerned about them again.

Conclusion: Now, why wouldn’t you hold fast? Why would you allow yourself to become dull and sluggish? The blessing has been pronounced! The oath has been made! We indeed have strong encouragement to hold fast to the hope set before us! Berry Kercheville

Is it OK to swear at 13?

It’s normal for kids to swear at one time or another. Young kids will often repeat something they’ve heard. Older kids often want to test their parents’ reactions. If your child has started using a few choice words, there are several discipline techniques you can use to curb their use of inappropriate language.

Why is swearing wrong?

Is it bad for children to hear or say swear words? – The harm question for adult swearing applies to issues such as verbal abuse, sexual harassment, and discrimination. When children enter the picture, offensive language becomes a problem for parents and a basis for censorship in media and educational settings.

  • Considering the ubiquity of this problem, it is interesting that psychology textbooks do not address the emergence of this behavior in the context of development or language learning.
  • Parents often wonder if this behavior is normal and how they should respond to it.
  • Our data show that swearing emerges by age two and becomes adult-like by ages 11 or 12.

By the time children enter school, they have a working vocabulary of 30-40 offensive words. We have yet to determine what children know about the meanings of the words they use. We do know that younger children are likely to use milder offensive words than older children and adults, whose lexica may include more strongly offensive terms and words with more nuanced social and cultural meanings.

We are currently collecting data to better understand the development of the child’s swearing lexicon. We do not know exactly how children learn swear words, although this learning is an inevitable part of language learning, and it begins early in life. Whether or not children (and adults) swear, we know that they do acquire a contextually-bound swearing etiquette — the appropriate ‘who, what, where, and when’ of swearing.

This etiquette determines the difference between amusing and insulting and needs to be studied further. Through interview data, we know that young adults report to have learned these words from parents, peers, and siblings, not from mass media. Considering that the consequences of children’s exposure to swear words are frequently cited as the basis for censorship, psychological scientists should make an effort to describe the normal course of the development of a child’s swearing lexicon and etiquette.

Is it OK for a 14 year old to swear?

High school: – Cursing is sometimes allowed but never to degrade or bully anyone, in or outside of the family. Some parents allow their tweens/teens to curse out of frustration, but forbid profanity-filled name calling. There is a big difference between cursing because you stubbed your toe and cursing at someone in a degrading way,

What Jesus teaches about swearing?

– Augustine : But what we could not understand by mere words, from the conduct of the saints we may gather in what sense should be understood what might easily be drawn the contrary way, unless explained by example. The Apostle has used oaths in his Epistles, and by this shows us how that ought to be taken, I say unto you, Swear not at all, namely, lest by allowing ourselves to swear at all we come to readiness in swearing, from readiness we come to a habit of swearing, and from a habit of swearing we fall into perjury.

  1. And so the Apostle is not found to have used an oath but only in writing, the greater thought and caution which that requires not allowing of slip of the tongue.
  2. Yet is the Lord’s command so universal, Swear not at all, that He would seem to have forbidden it even in writing.
  3. But since it would be an impiety to accuse Paul of having violated this precept, especially in his Epistles, we must understand the word at all as implying that, as far as lays in your power, you should not make a practice of swearing, not aim at it as a good thing in which you should take delight.

Augustine : Therefore in his writings, as writing allows of greater circumspection, the Apostle is found to have used an oath in several places, that none might suppose that there is any direct sin in swearing what is true; but only that our weak hearts are better preserved from perjury by abstaining from all swearing whatever.

Jerome : Lastly, consider that the Saviour does not here forbid to swear by God, but by the Heaven, the Earth, by Jerusalem, by a man’s head. For this evil practice of swearing by the elements the Jews had always, and are thereof often accused in the prophetic writing’s. For he who swears, shows either reverence or love for that by which he swears.

Thus when the Jews swore by the Angels, by the city of Jerusalem, by the temple and the elements, they paid to the creature the honour and worship belonging to God; for it is commanded in the Law that we should not swear but by the Lord our God. Chrysostom : Note how He exalts the elements of the world, not from their own nature, but from the respect which they have to God, so that there is opened no occasion of idolatry.

Does God forgive all sins?

Have I sinned too much to repent? – Jesus has paid the price for every sin. You may have felt like your sins are too serious or that you have made the same mistake too many times. But no matter how much we have sinned, we can always repent and be forgiven. Some sins may be easier to correct than others, but Jesus Christ has provided for total forgiveness from all sins. He is eager to forgive.

Can Christians eat pork?

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Pork is a food taboo among Jews, Muslims, and some Christian denominations, Swine were prohibited in ancient Syria and Phoenicia, and the pig and its flesh represented a taboo observed, Strabo noted, at Comana in Pontus,

A lost poem of Hermesianax, reported centuries later by the traveller Pausanias, reported an etiological myth of Attis destroyed by a supernatural boar to account for the fact that “in consequence of these events the Galatians who inhabit Pessinous do not touch pork”. In Abrahamic religions, eating pig flesh is clearly forbidden by Jewish ( kashrut ), Islamic ( halal ) and Adventist ( kosher animals ) dietary laws.

Although Christianity is also an Abrahamic religion, most of its adherents do not follow these aspects of Mosaic law and do consume its meat. However, Seventh-day Adventists consider pork taboo, along with other foods forbidden by Jewish law. The Ethiopian Orthodox Church and the Eritrean Orthodox Church do not permit pork consumption.

Can blasphemy be forgiven?

10 Things You Should Know about Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is mentioned in three of our four gospels. It is found in Matthew 12:22-32; Mark 3:22-30 and again in Luke 12:10. Many Christians are burdened by the thought that they may have committed this sin, or they live in paralyzing fear that some day they will.

It behooves us to examine precisely what Jesus meant. (1) The religious leaders had just witnessed Jesus cast out a demon from someone and they concluded from it that Jesus was himself possessed by Beelzebul or Satan and that it was in fact Satan himself who enabled Jesus to do this. In Matthew 12 we are told that a man who was both blind and mute was brought to Jesus.

Jesus proceeded to cast out the demon and heal the man. Instantly he could see and speak. The miracle was incontestable and beyond dispute. No one doubted that he was truly blind and mute. And the scribes didn’t doubt that he was also demonized. Their options are limited.

  1. There are only two possible explanations for what happened.
  2. This was no magical sleight of hand.
  3. This wasn’t a case of some slick magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat or doing amazing things with a deck of cards.
  4. This man was blind and mute and everyone knew it.
  5. Either his healing was the work of God or of the Devil.

Since they refused to acknowledge that it was God, they had no other options than to conclude Jesus did it by the power of Satan himself. (2) Our Lord’s response is profound. In essence he says, “Satan may be evil, but he’s not stupid!” That is to say, any kingdom or house or city that develops internal strife will ultimately self-destruct.

Satan’s domain is no different. Aside from God himself, Satan is probably the most intelligent being in the universe. He is not so insane as to permit internal division or civil war among his demons. Satan is, above all else, committed to self-preservation. He will do nothing that might threaten or reduce his power.

Jesus isn’t saying that there is harmony or trust or loyalty in Satan’s kingdom. Undoubtedly every demon in existence is selfish and perverted. But Satan would never allow any demon to undermine his efforts. Quite simply, Satan does not cast out Satan. But Jesus doesn’t stop there.

  • Satan is the “strong man”; his “house” or palace is this present world; and his “goods” or property are the men and women whom he holds in darkness and spiritual bondage (Matt.12:27).
  • But with the coming of Jesus, someone stronger has appeared and has assailed and conquered him.
  • Jesus has come to plunder Satan’s kingdom by rescuing the men and women who have been held captive to do his will.

Jesus “binds” Satan, the “strong man,” by virtue of his sinless life, his resistance to the temptation in the wilderness, his authoritative teaching in which truth prevails over falsehood, and ultimately by virtue of his death, resurrection, and exaltation to the right hand of the Father.

  • This, then, is the setting or context in which Jesus utters these ominous words about a sin that is beyond forgiveness.
  • 3) All sins can be forgiven, says Jesus in Mark 3:28.
  • Whatever blasphemies you utter, they too can be forgiven.
  • In Matthew’s gospel, Jesus says that even sins committed against him, the Son of Man, can be forgiven.
You might be interested:  What Does Do Not Disturb Do On Iphone?

But “whoever blasphemes against the Holy Spirit never has forgiveness, but is guilty of an eternal sin” (v.29). What is this “eternal sin”? It is not murder. Murder is a heinous sin, but not unforgiveable. Consider Moses, David, and Paul, all of whom were guilty of murder and yet received the forgiveness of God.

  1. Neither is it adultery.
  2. David committed adultery and yet he was forgiven (Ps.32:1-2).
  3. And what about the woman taken in adultery in John 8 whom Jesus forgave and told her to go and sin no more? And what about the Samaritan woman at the well in John 4? It is not denying Jesus under pressure or threat of persecution.

Consider Peter. One can hardly imagine a more grievous sin in which he three times denied that he knew Jesus. Yet we know that he was gloriously forgiven and restored to God and to ministry. Some have argued that suicide is the unforgiveable sin. But no text in either the Old or New Testaments ever says any such thing.

4) The religious leaders were not being accused of blaspheming against Jesus himself. In fact, in Matthew’s gospel Jesus says that “whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven” (12:32). Why was their sin against the Holy Spirit and not against Jesus? Their sin was against the Holy Spirit because it was by the power of the Spirit that Jesus performed his healings and miracles.

Jesus himself said in Matt.12:28 that it was “by the Spirit of God” that he “cast out demons.” Once again we see that the life Jesus lived, he lived in the power of the Spirit. The miracles he performed, he performed in the power of the Spirit. Thus their sin was attributing to the Devil what the Spirit did.

They didn’t deny the existence of the supernatural. They didn’t deny the reality of the miracle. They simply said, in a remarkable display of hardness of heart and spiritual blindness: the Devil empowered you to do it. (5) But why was this blasphemy of the Holy Spirit and his work so horrible, so reprehensible, so utterly outrageous that forgiveness becomes impossible? The answer is found in the relationship between Jesus and the religious leaders and how they responded to him.

Their repudiation of Jesus was not the result of ignorance or lack of evidence or because they believed the negative report of someone else who didn’t like Jesus. Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is willful, wide-eyed slandering of the work of the Spirit, attributing to the devil what was undeniably divine.

  • These people had seen as clearly as anyone could see and understood as lucidly as anyone could understand that Jesus performed his miracles by the power of the Spirit.
  • Yet they defiantly insisted, contrary to what they knew to be true, that it was Satan who empowered him.
  • The miracles Jesus performed were credentials of heaven.

The religious leaders declared them to be the credentials of hell. According to Matthew 12:30, they actually charged Jesus himself with being demonized! They didn’t merely deny Jesus’ deity. They, in effect, declared him to be a demon! His family may have thought he was mentally deranged, but the Pharisees declared him to be morally demonic.

  1. This, then, was not a one-time, momentary slip or inadvertent mistake in judgment.
  2. This was a persistent, life-long rebellion in the face of inescapable and undeniable truth.
  3. Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit is not a careless act committed only once in a moment of rage or rebellion, but a calloused attitude over time; a persistent defiance that hardens and calcifies the heart.

The Pharisees had been present when Jesus healed the sick. They saw him perform miracles up close and personal. They witnessed him raise the dead. They watched with their very eyes as skin infected with leprosy suddenly and decisively became clean and smooth and whole.

  1. They had heard him teach with power and authority.
  2. They had watched as demons fled his presence as he set free those in bondage.
  3. They watched with their own eyes as he gave sight to the blind.
  4. Notwithstanding all this, they openly and persistently and angrily and arrogantly declared that he did it all by the power of the Devil! (6) Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit, therefore, is not just unbelief; the sort of unbelief or rejection or doubt that is so typical in our world.

This is defiance of what one knows beyond any shadow of doubt to be true. It is not mere denial, but determined denial; not mere rejection but wanton, willful, wicked, wide-eyed rejection. This sin, therefore, isn’t unforgiveable because there is a defect in the atoning death of Jesus.

  1. It isn’t unforgiveable because there is a limit to God’s grace and mercy or because of some other shortcoming in the character of God.
  2. 7) Mark makes it plain that sins are forgiven only if a person repents (see Mark 1:4, 14-15; 4:12; 6:12; see also Acts 2:38 and 5:31).
  3. In order for anyone to receive forgiveness of sins, they have to repent.

They must turn from sin to God and cast themselves on his grace and follow him. So when Jesus says in Mark 3:28, “All sins will be forgiven the children of man and whatever blasphemies they utter,” he means, all sins and blasphemies from which you genuinely repent.

  1. 8) Why, then, in Mark 3:29 does Jesus seem to exclude one sin and one blasphemy from this promise: the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit? I think the reason is that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit puts you beyond repentance, and therefore beyond forgiveness.
  2. John Piper has rightly pointed out that verse 29 is not an exception to verse 28.

Jesus is not saying, all blasphemies that you repent of will be forgiven except blasphemy against the Spirit. He is saying, all blasphemies that you repent of will be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven because by its very nature it puts you beyond repentance.

  1. It is the sort of sin that issues from a heart so incorrigibly calloused that a person simply isn’t able to repent of it.
  2. If a sin makes it impossible for you to repent, then that is an unforgivable sin, because forgiveness is promised only to those sins from which we genuinely repent (cf.4:12).
  3. This sin precludes pardon because by its very nature it precludes repentance.

A sin of which one may repent is not the unpardonable sin. Therefore, those who are most worried that they may have committed the unpardonable sin have not. This is a sin for which there is no concern, no conviction, no anxiety, and thus no repentance.

  • It is a sin that is so hard-hearted and willful and persistent and defiant that the one committing it couldn’t care less that he or she is committing it.
  • So, yes, it is possible to put yourself beyond the possibility of forgiveness.
  • But that is not God’s fault.
  • It is not for lack of mercy in him.
  • It is not because he is limited in compassion or power or grace.

It is because a man or woman who has seen the truth and heard the truth and even tasted the truth has chosen to harden their heart to the point that they have rendered themselves impervious to repentance and conviction. (9) People who are ashamed of their sin have not committed the unforgiveable sin.

  • People who feel the conviction of the Holy Spirit in their hearts, who sense the piercing presence of guilt for having violated God’s Word, have not committed the unforgiveable sin.
  • People who are in fear they have committed the unforgiveable sin have not committed the unforgiveable sin! People who are broken by their sin, who are grieved by their sin, have not committed the unforgiveable sin.

(10) The bottom line is that I know with complete confidence when you have not committed the unforgiveable sin. But I don’t know when, if at all, a person has committed a sin in such a way that they have put themselves beyond the forgiveness of God. In the final analysis, it doesn’t matter if other people don’t or won’t forgive you.

  • It doesn’t matter if you can or can’t forgive yourself (assuming that is even a legitimate possibility, which it isn’t).
  • The only thing that ultimately matters is whether or not God has or has not forgiven you.
  • That’s easy to find out: have you trusted Jesus Christ as your only hope for heaven? When you think about the cross, do you see in what Jesus did there, dying for sinners, satisfying the wrath of God for sinners,,

do you see there your only hope for forgiveness and reconciliation with God? If so, I assure you yet again, you have not committed blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. You have not transgressed in such a way that forgiveness is impossible. : 10 Things You Should Know about Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit

Is it a sin to use God’s name in vain?

Taking God’s name in vain is offensive, inappropriate – Seymour Tribune How many times have you heard someone say, “Oh my God!” this week? Instead of saying, “Wow!” people often use God’s name as an exclamation point. “Oh my God! I got the job.” While some people may think this sounds extreme, it is a clear example of what it means to take God’s name in vain.

  • The scriptures are clear: God’s name should be spoken reverently.
  • We should take His name seriously.
  • Don’t ever speak His name flippantly or with disrespect.
  • Don’t use God’s name as a cliché, filler or figure of speech.
  • Be careful about speaking His name without even thinking about its importance.
  • Unfortunately, we have heard expressions like this so often, we have become accustomed to it.

We have been desensitized. But I find it hard to believe that God has been desensitized to people taking His name in vain. Exodus 20:7 tells us that we are not to misuse the name of the Lord, our God. That verse continues with a clear warning: “The Lord will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses His name.” The third commandment should not be taken lightly.

  1. Leviticus 24 says that a person caught taking God’s name in vain was to be stoned.
  2. It was a capital offense.
  3. God wants us to know that His name is important.
  4. When you misuse or disrespect God’s name, you are offending the creator of the universe.
  5. God wants His name to be treated with respect.
  6. There are so many ways we can use God’s name correctly.

We must reverence God’s name continually. Use His name carefully. Reference His name lovingly. Use God’s name as an act of worship. In Psalm 29:2, we are invited to “ascribe to the Lord the glory due His name; worship the Lord in the splendor of His holiness.” I am concerned that Christian people are far too comfortable with hearing God’s name being used disrespectfully.

  • Shouldn’t Christians be offended whenever God’s name is spoken in vain? The problem is we have been desensitized to what is going on.
  • But God takes this matter seriously, and so should we.
  • I have heard people say, “It doesn’t bother me.
  • I hear it all the time.
  • You should work where I work.
  • It is no big deal.” Don’t kid yourself.

It is a very big deal. It bothers God, and it should bother us. We should be concerned whenever we hear someone speak His name irreverently, and we should never do that ourselves. Blessings are promised to those who reverence God’s name. (See Psalm 61:5) You may read Steve Greene’s blog at pastorgreene.wordpress.com or you can email him at,

Who is the first to swear in the Bible?

Jewish tradition – The concept of oaths is deeply rooted within Judaism, It is found in Genesis 8:21, when God swears that he will “never again curse the ground because of man and never again smite every living thing”. This repetition of the term never again is explained by Rashi, the pre-eminent biblical commentator, as serving as an oath, citing the Talmud Shavous 36a for this ruling.

  1. The first personage in the biblical tradition to take an oath is held to be Eliezer, the chief servant of Abraham, when the latter requested of the former that he not take a wife for his son Isaac from the daughters of Canaan, but rather from among Abraham’s own family.
  2. The foundational text for oath making is in Numbers 30:2: “When a man voweth a vow unto the Lord, or sweareth an oath to bind his soul with a bond, he shall not break his word; he shall do according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth.” According to the Rabbis, a neder (usually translated as “vow”) refers to the object, a shâmar (usually translated as “oath”) to the person.

The passage distinguishes between a neder and a shvua, an important distinction between the two in Halakha : a neder changes the status of some external thing, while a shvua initiates an internal change in the one who swears the oath.

What does the church say about swearing?

What does the Church teach about swear words? Father Joe Waters December 1, 2021 | St. Paul’s injunction in Ephesians 4:29 is the ideal lesson for Christians about the propriety of speech: “No foul language should come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for needed edification, that it may impart grace to those who hear.” However, our mass media society has blurred the lines about what is considered “foul language.” And so, many people have developed a habit of using bad words and exercise little deliberation about whether their language promotes the good or is harmful.

  1. In teaching children, we should strive to present an objective standard to what is foul language and what is virtuous language in terms of St.
  2. Paul’s standard.
  3. Simply put, the Church asks us to consider the fruits of our speech.
  4. We should ask: Does what I am saying draw listeners’ minds to the higher things or the baser elements of human nature.

There are also many different ways to speak about foul language. For example, we tend to use the words “cursing” and “swearing” interchangeably even though they refer to different vices. Cursing means wishing bad things will occur to the other person, thus, cursing them.

On the other hand, swearing refers to bolstering our credibility by making an oath— for example, “I swear to God!” Remember what Jesus said about oaths Jesus said: “I say to you, do not swear at allsay yes when you mean yes and no when you mean no all else is the work of the evil one.” He means that if you always speak plainly and truthfully, you should not depend on devices such as oaths; instead, our truthfulness should be apparent.

We should also remember the commandment not to use the name of God in vain. Whenever we use the Divine Name, it should be in the context of prayer and praise. We should never utter “Our Heavenly Father,” Jesus Christ our Lord, or the Holy Spirit in a foul expression.

As with all of Catholic Morality, it is best to emphasize the idea of virtue, after which we strive and encourage children to seek forgiveness and absolution when they fail. Father Joe Waters is Judicial Vicar and Censor Librorum of the Diocese of St. Petersburg. If you have a question you would like us to consider for this series, email,

Gulf Coast Catholic was created by the Diocese of St. Petersburg to serve Tampa Bay, the Suncoast, and the Nature Coast. Our goal is to lead you closer to Christ and His Church. We provide articles that are designed to inspire you and guide you through the challenges of life.

What happens if you break a swear on your life?

The person who promised on you and broke the oath, has to and will suffer for his deed. It will not reflect on you. IF YOU WERE PART OF THE BREAKING OF THE OATH, THEN YOU WILL HAVE TO PAY.

Why is swearing bad?

Introduction – We were first introduced to the quote, “words are, of course, the most powerful drug used by mankind”, in a previous Viewpoint, which discusses how the words used by physical therapists have the capacity to either heal or cause harm, Like drugs, words have an ability to change the way another person thinks, feels, and performs.

  1. As physical therapists managing patients within a biopsychosocial approach, the language used may be just as important as, if not more important than, any examination finding or intervention.
  2. Swearing, or uttering a word that is considered taboo, is an often-ignored part of our language due to the controversial nature of the topic and the potential negative consequences of swearing.

In 1901, Patrick concluded that swearwords are primarily used by soldiers, sailors, laborers, uneducated people, and criminals, and men make up the majority of these social groups. While swearing has been considered a predominately masculine activity, women now tend to swear as much, or even more often, then men,

  1. Since swearing is considered taboo, these words are usually judged as shocking, and the swearer may be considered antisocial and offensive.
  2. Consequently, swearing can negatively impact how the swearer is perceived by others, which may lead to social isolation and depression.
  3. In groups of women with rheumatoid arthritis or breast cancer, Robbins et al.

found that swearing was related to increases in depressive symptoms, and this association remained significant even after accounting for variances in the depressive symptoms associated with disease severity. Interestingly, only swearing in the presence of others, and not swearing alone was correlated with increased depressive symptoms,

In specific contexts, swearing has been shown to produce negative outcomes. Swearing may also be a sign of intelligence, is associated with less lying and deception at the individual level and higher integrity at the society level, and may be a sign of creativity, The offensiveness and the positive or negative consequences of swearing is highly dependent on the context.

While it is not fully understood why swear words are so powerful, it has been suggested that swearing is learned during childhood and that aversive classical conditioning contributes to the emotionally arousing aspect of swear words, Swearers who disregard social codes and are at odds with the context, may offend the audience and break social convention, leading to negative consequences such as less positive attitudes towards the swearer,

You might be interested:  What Does Herpes Discharge Look Like?

This can occur by swearing in front of children or around people of higher status. To optimize the positive outcomes from swearing, physical therapists can use social codes cues of the situation which includes their intent, patient’s facial expressions, tone and gestures, and the relationship between the physical therapist and patient,

Humans have been swearing since the emergence of language and is quite common, with evidence suggesting 58% of the population swears “sometimes” or “often” and less than 10% of the population report “never” or “rarely” swearing, Most often, it is the swear word itself that is considered taboo rather than the semantic meaning it conveys.

Is it a sin to drink beer?

I used to drink too much. To be honest, I was a drunk. The Lord saved me from unbelief and addiction at the age of 21. I am now 37 and have been sober for almost 16 years. The Lord is good. For many years, my position on alcohol was simple: alcohol is not always bad, but it is never good.

  • However, I realize now that my thinking was not entirely based on Scripture.
  • I knew the Bible’s warnings against alcohol, but I didn’t see any value in drinking.
  • Since then, I’ve had to adjust my thinking on alcohol to align with Scripture.
  • Here is a biblical framework for thinking through this topic.
  • Drinking Alcohol is Not a Sin Contrary to what many Christians have grown up hearing, it is not a sin to drink alcohol.

Scripture nowhere condemns or prohibits consuming moderate levels of alcohol. Case in point—Jesus drank wine. The religious leaders accused our Lord of being a drunkard. “The Son of Man has come eating and drinking, and you say, ‘Look at him! A glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners!'” (Luke 7:34).

Of course, Jesus never got drunk, but he did drink wine. We all know he made water into wine at a party, and it would have been customary for him to enjoy a drink with his friends (John 2:1-11). It was also tradition for Jews to drink wine at the yearly Passover meal, in which Jesus routinely participated.

He also instituted the Lord’s Supper with bread and wine (Luke 22:14-20). It’s clear that drinking is not a sin; otherwise, Jesus would not have done it. Drinking Alcohol Can be a Blessing The Bible doesn’t present drinking in moderation as merely neutral; it is also depicted as a blessing.

  1. The Psalmist says that in addition to the many earthly blessings God bestows, the Lord gives “wine to gladden the heart of man” (Psalm 104:15).
  2. Friends enjoying a meal together may choose to enhance their gathering by sharing drinks.
  3. Alcohol can encourage relaxation, happiness, and laughter.
  4. These are all blessings from God (see also Eccl.9:7, Isaiah 55:1-3, Amos 9:14).

Alcohol can also be used for medicinal purposes. “Give strong drink to the one who is perishing, and wine to those in bitter distress.” (Proverbs 31:61, 1 Tim.5:23). Today, we use even stronger medications, but in the past, it was alcohol that provided relief from pain.

This, too, is a blessing from God. In a broken world full of pain, the Lord has provided help in our times of suffering. Finally, the Lord promised that in the New Heavens and New Earth, there will be wine when we feast with God Himself. “On this mountain the Lord of hosts will make for all peoples a feast of rich food, a feast of well-aged wine, of rich food full of marrow, of aged wine well refined.” (Isaiah 25:6).

The Lord will share a drink with us in heaven. Drunkenness is a Sin Drinking is not a sin, and it is often a God-given blessing. However, Scripture’s overwhelming testimony is that drinking alcohol can be spiritually dangerous. Christians are allowed by God to drink alcohol, but we are forbidden to get drunk.

“And do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery, but be filled with the Spirit.” (Ephesians 5:18; also see Proverbs 20:1, 23:20, Isaiah 5:22). This is a command from the Spirit-inspired apostle. Christians, “do not get drunk.” To get drunk, then, is a sin. Christians who drink alcohol may raise a question here.

“What does it mean to be drunk?” It’s a fair question. In most states, the blood alcohol content (BAC) limit for driving a vehicle is,08 (at this point, you are considered legally impaired). Body weight, how much one drinks, and the amount of time between drinks will determine your BAC.

For example, according to some research, a male weighing 200 lbs. can consume one 12 oz beer and only reach a level of,02 BAC. Our bodies metabolize alcohol over time, and our BAC will drop,015% every hour from our last drink. ( Source ) Additionally, many would argue that even though,08 is the legal standard for intoxication, that doesn’t necessarily meet the Bible’s definition of drunkenness.

The positive command Paul gives to believers in contrast to drunkenness is that we should be “filled with the Spirit” (Eph.5:18). The issue, then, is about control. We must be controlled by the Spirit and not alcohol. So then, drunkenness, in Paul’s mind, at least means we have lost control.

I suspect most believers would say that 1-2 drinks would not cause them to lose control. All this to say, what qualifies as being drunk varies from person to person. The command is easy: do not get drunk. Defining drunkenness, on the other hand, is not as simple. My pastoral counsel would be to err on the side of caution.

Use discretion and be wise with alcohol. Like sex, it can be wonderful, but if it is not contained and appropriately used, it can also be deadly. The measurements above are a helpful guide. Suppose we define drunkenness according to the dictionary, In that case, it means “having the faculties impaired by alcohol” and reaching “a level of alcohol in the blood that exceeds a maximum prescribed by law.” Paul’s counsel here is helpful.

  • ‘All things are lawful for me,’ but not all things are helpful.
  • All things are lawful for me,’ but I will not be enslaved by anything.” (1 Cor.6:12).
  • The Dangers of Alcohol I’d be willing to bet my last dollar that everyone reading this article has been impacted by addiction in one way or another.
  • Either you have struggled with substance abuse, or someone you know (and probably love) has struggled.

It’s an epidemic in our country, and alcohol is at the heart of it. This is why Scripture warns against the dangers of drunkenness. Several categories must be established here.

Drunkenness ruins lives. “Be not among drunkards or among gluttonous eaters of meat, for the drunkard and the glutton will come to poverty, and slumber will clothe them with rags.” (Proverbs 23:20-21). God’s judgment is on the drunkard. “Woe (a pronouncement of judgment) to those who rise early in the morning, that they may run after strong drink, who tarry late into the evening as wine inflames them!” (Isaiah 5:11, 22) Drunkards cannot serve in church leadership. Elders must be “sober mindedand not a drunkard.” Likewise, deacons cannot be “addicted to much wine” (1 Tim.3:2-3, 8, also see Prov.31:4-5). Drunkards are considered unbelievers in the Bible. “For the time that is past suffices for doing what the Gentiles want to do, living in sensuality, passions, drunkenness, orgies, drinking parties, and lawless idolatry” (1 Peter 4:3; also see Romans 13:13, Luke 21:34, Isaiah 28:1). Godliness is characterized by sober-mindedness. “Older women likewise are to be reverent in behavior, not slanderers or slaves to much wine.” (Titus 2:3). Drunkards will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.” (1 Cor.6:9-10, also see Gal.5:19-21).

What’s Our Motive for Drinking? Christians are called to live every part of their lives to the glory of God, and that includes both eating and drinking: “So whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.” (1 Cor.10:31). If our drinking alcohol helps us in appreciating a pleasure God created, especially in fellowship with others, it can be a blessing.

Yet, if our reason for drinking is to become drunk, seek temporary escape from difficulties, or conform to the practice of others against our conscience, we are drinking to our own peril. Some Christians may also have been guilty of flaunting their freedom in defiance of the convictions of other believers or with no regard for the temptations of others to drunkenness (1 Cor.8:8-13).

As with any action we take, we must ensure it demonstrates both our love for the Lord and for others. God created alcohol, and in many places, the Bible describes it a God-given gift and blessing. But like all things the Lord has given, we must use it with wisdom and caution.

Unfortunately, because we are sinners, we tend to turn God’s good gifts into idolatry and sin. Alcohol is no exception. In fact, it stands out as one of Scripture’s major themes regarding warnings and judgment against a particular kind of sin. Drunkenness, therefore, is forbidden, and for good reason. The drunkard’s life is dishonoring to God and destructive to oneself, family, and friends.

Worst of all, a drunkard is a slave to alcohol and demonstrates a heart where the Holy Spirit does not reside. As Scripture says, such a person will not go to heaven. Note: This article and our many resources are made available for free through the generous support of others. Brandon is the Associate Pastor of The Journey Church in Lebanon, TN and leads the TJC RE:GENERATION ministry for the church. Brandon is married to Sherrie and has a daugher, Emma. Recent Articles:

How to Approach Reading the Bible: The 7 Types of Bible Literature Making Wise New Year’s Resolutions: 7 Ways to Start the Year Right Should I Leave My Church? 7 Biblical Reasons to Leave

What is prohibited in Christianity?

Early Christianity – The Council of Jerusalem instructed gentile Christians not to consume blood, food offered to idols, or the meat of strangled animals, since “the Law of Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues on every Sabbath.” In Judaism, Jews are forbidden from consuming (amongst other things) any carnivores and omnivores, herbivores that are not ruminants, any ruminants that do not have split hooves, shellfish (including shrimps and lobsters ), unscaled and finless fish, blood, food offered to idols, or the meat of living or strangled animals.

Where in the Bible does it say you can drink?

Should Christians Drink Alcohol? “Here are your keys,” muttered the secretary when I arrived to pick up the keys to my office at Aberdeen University, where I would be studying for my doctorate in theology. “It looks like you’re in The Old Brewery.” Intrigued by the name, I later found out that it reflected the building’s original function.

Aberdeen was founded in the 15th century and used to train monks for ministry. In the brewery, monks brewed vast quantities of Scottish ale, which was served by the liter at mealtimes. And here I was, a post-fundamentalist Ph.D. student studying the Scriptures in a malted sanctuary where late medieval Bible college students once clapped mugs together in an act of worship.

Throughout Christian history, alcohol was rarely a taboo as it is in some circles today. John Calvin had a stipend of 250 gallons of wine per year written into his church contract. Martin Luther’s wife was a famed brewer of beer, which certainly won Martin’s heart.

  • And the Guinness family created their renowned Irish Stout as an act of worship to Jesus.
  • From Bordeaux to Berlin, wine and beer have always been part of church tradition.
  • But what was once considered the nectar of heaven was later condemned as the devil’s libation.
  • Moderation not Abstinence Even though some Christians advocate for the total abstinence of alcohol as a moral mandate for all believers, the Bible never requires all believers to abstain from alcohol.

It condemns drunkenness and being enslaved to wine (Ephesians 5:18; Titus 2:3), but it never says that tee-totaling is the better way to obey God. In fact, the Bible never says that abstaining from alcohol is the wisest way to avoid getting drunk. Think about it.

  • Alcoholism has been rampant through every age, but the Bible never says that all believers should therefore refrain from drinking.
  • If Christians want to forbid all alcohol consumption to avoid drunkenness, then to be consistent, they should also avoid making a lot of money to guard against the crushing sin of materialism and the misuse of wealth.

What About our Testimony? I sometimes hear that when Christians drink, it ruins their testimony. But quite honestly, I’ve never understood this line of thinking. It’s one thing if you’ve struggled with alcoholism or are ministering in a Muslim country, but for the most part, most non-Christians I know are turned off by the arbitrary dos and don’ts created by modern Christians.

  1. I’m not convinced that if my unbelieving neighbor sees me slipping into a pub, I will lose much traction to my Gospel witness.
  2. In many cases, the Gospel will shine brighter when you break down wrong assumptions about Christianity by having a beer with your neighbor.
  3. When we strip away all the man-made clutter that dims the Gospel, the full glory of Jesus shines much brighter.

A good chunk of the dying world that’s rejected Christianity hasn’t said no to Jesus, but no to a pharisaical version of Him. Some people have been turned off by the Gospel because they’ve thought that becoming a Christ-follower meant giving up having a beer with your friends after work.

If this is the “good news” we preach, then the true beauty of a crucified and risen King will become covered in the fog of a man-made, pharisaical “don’t drink” gospel. AA didn’t hang on a cross for your sins and abstaining from alcohol won’t give you resurrection life. Any Christianese, man-made, unbiblical footnotes to the gospel are actually a distraction and offense to the Gospel.

Lower Alcohol Content? Now, some say that wine in the Bible was nothing more than grape juice and therefore neither Jesus nor the Biblical writers advocated drinking alcohol. Others say that wine was so diluted that it hardly contained any alcohol. But neither of these views can be substantiated by what the Scriptures actually say.

  1. If wine was really unfermented grape juice, then why did Paul warn the Ephesians: “Do not get drunk with grape juice, which is debauchery, but be filled by the Spirit?” This doesn’t make sense.
  2. It is true that wine back then probably had a lower ABV than today’s stuff.
  3. But whatever the alcohol content, people were quite able to get smashed by drinking too much of it (Proverbs 20:1; Isaiah 5:11).

Still, the Bible never says not to drink it. There’s another alcoholic beverage mentioned in the Bible called “strong drink. The Hebrew word for “strong drink,” shakar, refers to fermented barley, which is why some translations call it “beer.” Shakar had an ABV of around 6-12 percent, similar to a Belgium Tripel Ale or a Double IPA.

  1. Like all alcoholic beverages, the Bible prohibits abusing beer (Isaiah 5:11; 28:7; Proverbs 20:1; 31:4).
  2. But in moderation, drinking beer was encouraged (Proverbs 31:6).
  3. In fact, Deuteronomy 14:26 actually commands Israelites to use some of their tithe money to buy some beers and celebrate before the Lord.

(Ever hear that verse being read as the ushers are passing the plates?) They were also commanded to offer up two liters of beer to God six days a week and even more on the Sabbath (see Numbers 28:7-10). This is why the absence of beer (and wine) was an outcome of God’s judgment on the nation.

Wine as a Blessing But the Bible goes further than admitting that drinking is simply allowed. Throughout Scripture, the production and consumption of beer and wine are often connected to the covenant promises of God. Under the old covenant, wine is a blessing (Deut 7:13; 11:14) and the absence of wine a curse (28:39, 51).

When Israel looked to the future, God promises to flood them wine flowing from the mountaintops (Amos 9:14; Joel 3:18) and vats brimming with fresh wine (Joel 2:19, 24). Jesus signals the beginning of such blessings by creating an over-abundance (150 gallons) of wine at Cana (John 2:1-10).

And on the eve of his death, He sanctified a cup of wine as “the new covenant in my blood” (Luke 22:14-23). When Christ comes back, He’ll prepare “well-aged wine” (Isaiah 25:6)—the stuff I only notice on the top shelf but can never afford—and for theological reasons it will be served, as at Cana, in abundance.

Although a good beer and rich wine are blessings from God, they should be consumed with caution. There’s a growing tendency, however, among some younger evangelicals to celebrate their freedom without discipline. These young, restless, and slightly inebriated libertines are doing some great things for the Kingdom.

  1. They’re feeding the poor, living in community and planting authentic churches—or missional communities—all to the glory of God.
  2. Yes, God cares about the poor; He also cares about your sobriety.
  3. Enjoying alcohol in moderation takes discipline, and many beer drinkers, I hate to say it, aren’t known for their discipline.

A good glass of beer can be celebratory; it doesn’t belong in the hands of an undisciplined 16-year-old playing video games in his mom’s basement. Belgium ale is strong and complex. Savor it, sanctify it, and let it meditate on your palate. Give glory to God, not just to your thirst, when enjoying the blessings that flow from Eden.

  1. Drunkenness may not be at the top of God’s list of most heinous sins; neither should it be tossed aside as a relic of American fundamentalism.
  2. Drinking alcohol without celebrating the Cross and Kingdom is theologically anemic.
  3. Abusing alcohol mocks the blood of Christ and scoffs at God’s holiness.
  4. But moderate, intentional, celebratory and reflective drinking of wine and beer, which contemplates the crucified and risen King and anticipates our future glory, is rooted in the grace that poured from Christ’s veins on Calvary.

I originally wrote this post for in 2014. : Should Christians Drink Alcohol?